Maxwell-Boltzmann Equation (avg velocity)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Calpalned
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Velocity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around deriving the mean particle speed using the Maxwell-Boltzmann equation, which is expressed as a function of velocity. The average speed formula, derived from statistical functions, integrates the probability density function over all possible velocities. Division by the number of particles is deemed unnecessary because the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution already accounts for speed per particle. Integration extends from zero to infinity since, in non-relativistic theory, there is no upper limit on particle speed. Understanding these concepts is crucial for applying the Maxwell-Boltzmann equation effectively.
Calpalned
Messages
297
Reaction score
6
A question asked me to derive a symbolic expression for mean particle speed using the Max-Boltz equation. I know that Max-Boltz equation is a function of velocity (v).
The Max-Boltz equation is ##f=(\frac{m}{2\pi kT})^{3/2}4\pi v^2 exp(\frac{-mv^2}{2kT})##
Apparently the general formula for the average given a statistical function is ##\bar{v}=\int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{fvdv}{n}##
Here is what I don't understand:

1) Where did this formula come from? Does this formula only apply to statistical functions? What is a statistical function?
2) It turns out that division by the number of particles (n) is unnecessary for the Max-Boltz equation. What is reasoning behind this?
3) Why is the integration from zero to infinity? Clearly no particle can have infinite velocity...
Thank you again!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Calpalned said:
1) Where did this formula come from? Does this formula only apply to statistical functions? What is a statistical function?
Consider a random variable with discrete values (such as a die). The expectation value is given by summing over the probability of each event times its value:
$$
\begin{align}
\langle x \rangle &= \sum_i P_i x_i \\
&= \frac{1}{6} 1 + \frac{1}{6} 2 + \frac{1}{6} 3 + \frac{1}{6} 4 + \frac{1}{6} 5 + \frac{1}{6} 6 = 3.5
\end{align}
$$
The first line above is the generic equation, the second line is the specific example of a six-sided die. When the random variable is continuous, the sum becomes an integral:
$$
\langle x \rangle = \int f(x) x \, dx
$$
where ##f(x)## is the probability density function (pdf), i.e., the probability that the random variable will have a value between ##x## and ##x + dx##.

Calpalned said:
2) It turns out that division by the number of particles (n) is unnecessary for the Max-Boltz equation. What is reasoning behind this?
I guess it depends on how the pdf is defined. Normally, the MB distribution will give you the speed pdf per particle, so there is no factor 1/n.

Calpalned said:
3) Why is the integration from zero to infinity? Clearly no particle can have infinite velocity...
Thank you again!
This is a non-relativistic theory. Speed is not bounded, so you have to integrate up to infinity.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...

Similar threads

Back
Top