Maxwell Equations: Deriving 1 Equation from 2

AI Thread Summary
Maxwell's equations in electromagnetism have evolved from six original equations to four, then to two through vector analysis and special relativity. There is a discussion about deriving a single equation from these two without losing information. The suggestion is to express Maxwell's equations using differential forms, which may require additional mathematical tools. Resources like Wikipedia and Ryder's Quantum Field Theory book are recommended for further understanding. The conversation emphasizes the importance of mathematical frameworks in simplifying complex equations.
ghery
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Hi:

In electromagnetism, Maxwell equations originally were 6, with the aid of vector analysis, these equations were simplified and they became 4, after that with the aid of special relativity and tensor analysis (for the electromagnetic tensor) they became 2.

Now I have seen (I don't remember where) that these two equations became just one without any loss of information, Does anybody know how to derive these equation?, What is that equation?, and by the way what other mathematical tools do I need in order to derive it?

Thanks for your support
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ghery said:
Hi:

In electromagnetism, Maxwell equations originally were 6, with the aid of vector analysis, these equations were simplified and they became 4, after that with the aid of special relativity and tensor analysis (for the electromagnetic tensor) they became 2.

Now I have seen (I don't remember where) that these two equations became just one without any loss of information, Does anybody know how to derive these equation?, What is that equation?, and by the way what other mathematical tools do I need in order to derive it?

Thanks for your support

I guess what you want is Maxwell equations written in terms of differential forms. However, it takes two. You may first try
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maxwell's_equations
As for the basic introduction of forms, you can read Ryder's QFT book.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top