Maxwell's Electrodynamics: The Unusual and Incomplete Theory by Duhem (1902)

  • Thread starter Thread starter carl susumu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Maxwell Theory
AI Thread Summary
Duhem critiques Maxwell's approach to electrodynamics, highlighting its vagueness and contradictions. He notes that Maxwell's incomplete theory lacks clarity, making it difficult for readers to grasp his evolving ideas. Despite these flaws, Duhem acknowledges that this unconventional method ultimately contributed to the development of the electromagnetic theory of light. The discussion touches on the philosophical implications of scientific theories rather than purely physical concepts. The thread was closed due to its philosophical focus, which did not align with forum rules.
carl susumu
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
"Maxwell's electrodynamics proceeds in the same unusual way already analyzed in studying his electrostatics. Under the influence of hypotheses which remain vague and undefined in his mind, Maxwell sketches a theory which he never completes, he does not even bother to remove contradictions from it; then he starts changing this theory, he imposes on it essential modifications which he does not notify to his reader; the latter tries in vain to fix the fugitive and intangible thought of the author; just when he thinks he has got it, even the parts of the doctrine dealing with the best studied phenomena are seen to vanish. And yet this strange and disconcerting method led Maxwell to the electromagnetic theory of light!" (Duhem, 1902).What is this Duhem talking about. Is he a real person or what?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Duhem was a French physicist and philosopher of science:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pierre_Duhem

The passage you quote is not really talking about physics but is more philosophy of science, and is therefore not a good discussion topic per the PF rules. Therefore, this thread is closed.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
25
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
42
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top