Maxwell's Equations: Draw State of Polarization & Find B(x,t)

  • Thread starter Thread starter leoflindall
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Maxwell's equations
leoflindall
Messages
38
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Draw the state of polarization of the electromagnetic (EM) wave defined by

*****PLEASE NOTE EQUATION SHOWN IN NEXT POST****** (For some reason can't change it in this post...

with Eo real. Use a sentence to describe in words the state of polarization of this EM wave.

Use the differential form of Faraday's law to obtain B(x,t) for the same EM wave


Homework Equations



*****PLEASE NOTE EQUATION SHOWN IN NEXT POST****** (For some reason can't change it in this post...

The Attempt at a Solution



I have done the first part and found the EM wave to be circularly polarized (anticlockwise) with an amplitude of E0

i am unsure how to use faradays law. I tried breaking the LHS of faraday into its respective partial differential vector form, which i am currently working my way through but i am fairly sure it is wrong!

Any ideas on how to apply to get the magnetic field from the electric using faraday-maxwell's law would be greatly appreciated!

Many Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry i copied and pasted the equation and it has come out wrong...

It should read

E(x,t) = Eo( y + e^(i3\Pi/2) z )e^(i(kx-\omegat)) ,


Bold Letters denote unit vectors

Relevant Equations;

\nabla x E = - \partialB / \partial t (Faraday-Maxwell Equation)

Excuse my mistake!
 
Last edited:
Your electric field is given by

<br /> \mathbf{E}=E(x,y,z,t)=E_0\exp[i(kx-\omega t)]\hat{\mathbf{y}}+E_0\exp[i(kx-\omega t)]\exp\left[i\frac{3\pi}{2}\right]\hat{\mathbf{z}}<br />

correct? But we also know \mathbf{E}=Re(\mathbf{E}&#039;\exp[i\omega t]) where \mathbf{E}&#039; is the spatial component of the electric field. Then through Faraday's law,

<br /> \mathbf{B}&#039;=-\frac{1}{i\omega}\nabla\times\mathbf{E}&#039;<br />

You can then solve \mathbf{B}=Re(\mathbf{B}&#039;\exp[i\omega t]).
 
Now that I've had a good night's rest, you can actually ignore the fact that I said the real components of the spatial electric and magnetic components. This would only be true if your original electric field were given by cosine.
 
Thank you, that really helps! I appreciate it!
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top