May 10-12 1999 The Day the Solar Wind Disappeared

AI Thread Summary
On May 10-12, 1999, reports emerged claiming that 98% of the solar wind ceased, despite SOHO satellite images appearing normal. This phenomenon was linked to unusual polar auroras and electron rain, raising questions about the broader impacts on Earth's atmosphere. The authenticity of the claims is debated, with some considering the source unreliable. Historical instances of similar solar wind reductions have occurred, prompting discussions on their effects. The event remains a topic of interest for further investigation into solar activity and its implications.
Philosophaie
Messages
456
Reaction score
0
On May 10-12 1999 it has been stated in a website that the Solar Wind Disappeared.

It stated that 98% of the total solar wind stopped but the piciures of the the SOHO satellite looked normal.

Is this true or a crackpot site?

The polar borialis was said to be strange and a phenonema of polar rain of electrons occured. If this is true what else was effected because the solar wind constantly bombards the atmosophere on the sun's side, good or bad.

Could anyone corroborate this story.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
It was a real event. Whether or not the site is a crackpot site or not is undetermined.

It's happened at least two other times.
 
Can you elaborate on some of the effects and the dates of some of the other recorded happenings.
 
Last edited:
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Back
Top