Mean Orbital Separation Question

AI Thread Summary
Orbital separation refers to the average distance between a planet and its moon during their orbit. To calculate it, one can use the orbital period formula, which can be rearranged to solve for the semi-major axis, representing the mean orbital separation. In the given scenario, a moon with a mass of 0.5 times Pluto orbits a planet with a mass of 2 times Pluto, resulting in a total system mass of 2.5 times Pluto. Resources like orbit simulators can assist in performing the necessary calculations. Understanding these concepts is crucial for accurately determining orbital dynamics.
hulkster1988
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
So it was basic to figure out the masses and such, but I'm not exactly sure what the "orbital separation" really is? Can someone enlighten me? Here is the question for reference:

A moon with a mass one quarter that of its parent planet orbits that
planet with a period of 12 days. The mass of the planet is twice that of
Pluto. What is the mean orbital separation of the planet and its moon?

Thanks for any help.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
planet = 2Pluto
moon = .25 * 2Pluto = 0.5Pluto
total system mass = 2.5 Pluto

Google for Pluto's mass

Once you have it, you can algebraically re-write the Period formula P=2pi*sqrt(a3)/GM) to solve for a, the semi-major axis, which should equal to your orbital separation in a circular orbit, or your average orbital distance when averaged over longitude rather than time. There's a couple of calculators on this page: http://orbitsimulator.com/formulas/ that will do it for you. The 3rd one is the Period formula, and the 4th one is this formula re-written to solve for "a".
 
Great, thanks a lot ...that link is very helpful
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top