Meaning = Information + Evolution

AI Thread Summary
The paper presents a foundational approach to understanding meaningful information by linking it to physical processes, suggesting that concepts like meaning, signal, and intentionality can be derived from a purely physical definition. Inspired by Kolchinsky and Wolpert's model and building on Dretske's work, it posits that meaningful information has evolutionary origins tied to Darwinian principles. This perspective aims to connect the physical world with the realms of meaning, purpose, and value, potentially bridging significant gaps in understanding. The discussion has been closed for moderation, indicating a shift away from philosophical debates.
*now*
Messages
97
Reaction score
71
This paper offers a "first link of a chain", bridging physical and, psychological or linguistically, mental notions of meaningful information.

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1611.02420.pdf
Meaning = Information + Evolution

Carlo Rovelli

CPT, Aix-Marseille Universit ́e, Universit ́e de Toulon, CNRS, F-13288 Marseille, France.

Notions like meaning, signal, intentionality, are difficult to relate to a physical word. I study a purely physical definition of “meaningful information”, from which these notions can be derived. It is inspired by a model recently illustrated by Kolchinsky and Wolpert, and improves on Dretske classic work on the relation between knowledge and information. I discuss what makes a physical process into a “signal”.

A quote from the paper- "The semantic notions of information and meaning are ul- timately tied to their Darwinian evolutionary origin. The suggestion is that the notion of meaningful information serves as a ground for the foundation of meaning. That is, it could offer the link between the purely physical world and the world of meaning, purpose, intentionality and value. It could bridge the gap."
 
  • Like
Likes DuckAmuck
Science news on Phys.org
Temporary closed for moderation.
 
Although this is a good paper, we no longer host discussions of a philosophical nature. The thread will remain closed.
 
Historian seeks recognition for first English king https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c9d07w50e15o Somewhere I have a list of Anglo-Saxon, Wessex and English kings. Well there is nothing new there. Parts of Britain experienced tribal rivalries/conflicts as well as invasions by the Romans, Vikings/Norsemen, Angles, Saxons and Jutes, then Normans, and various monarchs/emperors declared war on other monarchs/emperors. Seems that behavior has not ceased.

Similar threads

Back
Top