Meaning of Dyadic Green Function in Electromagnetism

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the use of dyadic Green functions in electromagnetism, particularly when transitioning from scalar to vector potential formulations. It highlights that while scalar Green functions are adequate for the vector potential, dyadic Green functions are necessary when dealing with field equations. The participants clarify that the indices of the dyadic represent the direction of the field component and the source current component, respectively. Specifically, Gxy indicates the x-component of the field resulting from the y-component of the source current. Understanding this relationship is crucial for applying dyadic Green functions effectively in electromagnetic problems.
Apollo2010
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I know that in the vector potential formulation one can use a scalar Green function (to find the said potential and from then on the electric and magnetic fields), and that this works because the components of the potential are in the same direction as those of the source - i.e. a current in the x-direction will give you the x-component of the potential.

I also know that this is no longer true if instead of a differential equation involving the vector potential, we use equations involving the fields, and this is why we have to use a dyadic Green function in this case rather than a scalar one.

My question is: what do the columns and rows of the dyadic represent?

I assume one index represents the direction of the component of the Green's function itself, i.e. the direction of the component of the field due to a unit idealized differential bit of current? And the other index represents the component of the differential bit of current responsible for that dyadic element? For instance, Gxy would be the x component of the field due to the y component of the source current (or the other way around?)? Is that right, and if so which index represents what?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"Gxy would be the x component of the field due to the y component of the source current" is correct.
 
You should take a look at tensor products to see how the dyad acts, though Meir Achuz pretty much explains it, but it isn't that scary of an operation. I always looked at it like a matrix-vector product (as scary as that may be to mathematicians).
 
Thank you very much!
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top