Meaning of Dyadic Green Function in Electromagnetism

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the use of dyadic Green functions in electromagnetism, particularly when transitioning from scalar to vector potential formulations. It highlights that while scalar Green functions are adequate for the vector potential, dyadic Green functions are necessary when dealing with field equations. The participants clarify that the indices of the dyadic represent the direction of the field component and the source current component, respectively. Specifically, Gxy indicates the x-component of the field resulting from the y-component of the source current. Understanding this relationship is crucial for applying dyadic Green functions effectively in electromagnetic problems.
Apollo2010
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I know that in the vector potential formulation one can use a scalar Green function (to find the said potential and from then on the electric and magnetic fields), and that this works because the components of the potential are in the same direction as those of the source - i.e. a current in the x-direction will give you the x-component of the potential.

I also know that this is no longer true if instead of a differential equation involving the vector potential, we use equations involving the fields, and this is why we have to use a dyadic Green function in this case rather than a scalar one.

My question is: what do the columns and rows of the dyadic represent?

I assume one index represents the direction of the component of the Green's function itself, i.e. the direction of the component of the field due to a unit idealized differential bit of current? And the other index represents the component of the differential bit of current responsible for that dyadic element? For instance, Gxy would be the x component of the field due to the y component of the source current (or the other way around?)? Is that right, and if so which index represents what?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"Gxy would be the x component of the field due to the y component of the source current" is correct.
 
You should take a look at tensor products to see how the dyad acts, though Meir Achuz pretty much explains it, but it isn't that scary of an operation. I always looked at it like a matrix-vector product (as scary as that may be to mathematicians).
 
Thank you very much!
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top