Measure Phase velocity/group velocity of EM-wave

AI Thread Summary
Measuring phase and group velocity of electromagnetic waves, particularly in the visible region, presents challenges due to the nature of wave packets. Phase velocity measurement is often not feasible because the surface representing constant phase may not be planar or may not travel in the same direction as the wave. Additionally, the amplitude on that surface can be very small, complicating detection. For RF and microwave frequencies, phase detectors or saturated mixers can be used to measure these velocities. Understanding these limitations is crucial for accurate measurement in practical applications.
spookyfw
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Hey folks,

some weeks ago we had an trial-exam and one of the questions there was: "How do you measure phase and group velocity."

That question really got me. Having a fastly oscillating wave as carrier and then the envelope. Can someone help me? Is it impossible for the phase, as it is usually a harmonic one?

Would be really great if someone would know the answer,
take care,
spookyfw
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am assuming you are talking about EM signals.
How you do it depends on the frequency range. For RF/Microwave you can use a phase detector, these are either dedicated components that you can buy; or you use a saturated mixer.
 
Sorry for this very late reply. First of all: thank you very much for your answer. Yes, I was talking about EM-waves. More about a pulse in the visible region though. I wondered how one would then discriminate and measure phase and group velocity. Using a phase detector sounds reasonable, but how does it work?

Would be really grateful if someone would know :).
 
Hi spookyfw,

Except in very special circumstances, measurement of phase velocity is not feasible for a number of reasons:

1. The surface that represents the constant phase of the entire wave packet may not necessarily be a plane.

2. That surface may not necessarily travel in the same direction as the wave.

3. The amplitude of the wave on that surface may be extremely small.

4. That surface may lie outside of the causal influence of the wave.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top