Measure Phase velocity/group velocity of EM-wave

AI Thread Summary
Measuring phase and group velocity of electromagnetic waves, particularly in the visible region, presents challenges due to the nature of wave packets. Phase velocity measurement is often not feasible because the surface representing constant phase may not be planar or may not travel in the same direction as the wave. Additionally, the amplitude on that surface can be very small, complicating detection. For RF and microwave frequencies, phase detectors or saturated mixers can be used to measure these velocities. Understanding these limitations is crucial for accurate measurement in practical applications.
spookyfw
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Hey folks,

some weeks ago we had an trial-exam and one of the questions there was: "How do you measure phase and group velocity."

That question really got me. Having a fastly oscillating wave as carrier and then the envelope. Can someone help me? Is it impossible for the phase, as it is usually a harmonic one?

Would be really great if someone would know the answer,
take care,
spookyfw
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am assuming you are talking about EM signals.
How you do it depends on the frequency range. For RF/Microwave you can use a phase detector, these are either dedicated components that you can buy; or you use a saturated mixer.
 
Sorry for this very late reply. First of all: thank you very much for your answer. Yes, I was talking about EM-waves. More about a pulse in the visible region though. I wondered how one would then discriminate and measure phase and group velocity. Using a phase detector sounds reasonable, but how does it work?

Would be really grateful if someone would know :).
 
Hi spookyfw,

Except in very special circumstances, measurement of phase velocity is not feasible for a number of reasons:

1. The surface that represents the constant phase of the entire wave packet may not necessarily be a plane.

2. That surface may not necessarily travel in the same direction as the wave.

3. The amplitude of the wave on that surface may be extremely small.

4. That surface may lie outside of the causal influence of the wave.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top