B Measurements of angles in circular method

parshyaa
Messages
307
Reaction score
19
  • Why θ in radian equals arc/radius?
I know that it can't be proved but there must be a explanation for this formula. How founder may have got this idea.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
parshyaa said:
  • Why θ in radian equals arc/radius?
I know that it can't be proved but there must be a explanation for this formula. How founder may have got this idea.
It's a definition. Definitions aren't proved.
One radian is the angle subtended by a sector of a circle for which the arc length of the sector is equal to the radius of the circle.
 
Mark44 said:
It's a definition. Definitions aren't proved.
One radian is the angle subtended by a sector of a circle for which the arc length of the sector is equal to the radius of the circle.
OK, 2πr/1 = 360°, can we say that here arc = 2πr and radius =1 , therefore we get 2π = 360° , this may be the reason which made founder to make it as a definition , this is just my thinking
 
parshyaa said:
OK, 2πr/1 = 360°, can we say that here arc = 2πr and radius =1 , therefore we get 2π = 360° , this may be the reason which made founder to make it as a definition , this is just my thinking

A major motivation for defining "radian" (in the standard way) is that it makes many mathematical formulas simple. If "radian" were defined differently, then many formulas that effectively have the constant factor of "1" in them would have to be rewritten with a different constant factor.

Are you familiar with the definitions of "angular velocity" and "tangential velocity" as applied to an object moving in a circle ? The definition of "radian" creates a simple relation between them.

If you have studied calculus, you can understand that the definition of "radian" creates a simple relation between trigonometric functions (like sin(x)) and their derivatives.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top