Measuring current output from a floating current source

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around measuring the current output from a floating current source, specifically using an isolation unit that converts voltage input to current output. Participants explore measurement techniques, the implications of impedance, and the challenges faced when using an oscilloscope for high voltage signals.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes their setup with a 100kOhm resistor and oscilloscope but reports a discrepancy in the expected current measurement, suggesting a potential error in their measurement approach.
  • Another participant advises using a resistor with a much lower value and a high input impedance multimeter to obtain accurate measurements.
  • A different perspective notes that the oscilloscope's 50Ohm input impedance effectively acts as a measurement resistor, which could lead to confusion in interpreting the voltage readings.
  • One participant expresses confusion about measuring high amplitude signals with an oscilloscope and seeks clarification on the concept of impedance and its physical implications.
  • Another participant suggests that if the oscilloscope's input is limited to 50Ohms, the 100kOhm resistor can be placed in series with it to measure the voltage drop accurately.
  • There is a question raised about whether the isolation unit actually produces the expected voltage output for a given input.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best method for measuring the current output, as there are multiple suggestions and approaches presented, with some participants expressing confusion about the implications of impedance and measurement techniques.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations related to the oscilloscope's ability to measure high voltage signals and the potential impact of the oscilloscope's input impedance on the accuracy of current measurements. There is also uncertainty regarding the actual output voltage of the isolation unit based on the input provided.

yapatel
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi -

I am by no means an EE, so please be aware I may have some fundamental flaws in my knowledge.

I have a battery powered isoluation unit that takes some voltage in and provides either a voltage or current source output. I am giving it 1V as an input and according to the conversion ratio, I should be getting 1mA out, however I am having trouble measuring it.

I took a 100kOhm resistor and connected the two output leads of the isoluation unit (red and black) to the resistor (so now the resistor is in series with the output of the isolation unit). Then I took another set of leads (red and black with a BNC connection) and plugged it up to my oscilloscope and set the input impedance of the scope to be 50Ohms. This gives me a measure of the voltage across the resistor.

I know that using V=IR I should be able to take the voltage shown on my oscilloscope, divide it by 100kOhm and get my current value. However when I do this I get a reading of 50mV on my oscilloscope, which means my current is 0.0005 mA. But this is not right since I should be getting 1mA out.

I checked the 1V input I am giving the isolation unit and it is showing up as a 1V signal on my oscilloscope. I am confident I am doing something wrong in measuring this current but am not sure what. Help/advice?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
yapatel said:
Hi -

I am by no means an EE, so please be aware I may have some fundamental flaws in my knowledge.

I have a battery powered isoluation unit that takes some voltage in and provides either a voltage or current source output. I am giving it 1V as an input and according to the conversion ratio, I should be getting 1mA out, however I am having trouble measuring it.

I took a 100kOhm resistor and connected the two output leads of the isoluation unit (red and black) to the resistor (so now the resistor is in series with the output of the isolation unit). Then I took another set of leads (red and black with a BNC connection) and plugged it up to my oscilloscope and set the input impedance of the scope to be 50Ohms. This gives me a measure of the voltage across the resistor.

I know that using V=IR I should be able to take the voltage shown on my oscilloscope, divide it by 100kOhm and get my current value. However when I do this I get a reading of 50mV on my oscilloscope, which means my current is 0.0005 mA. But this is not right since I should be getting 1mA out.

I checked the 1V input I am giving the isolation unit and it is showing up as a 1V signal on my oscilloscope. I am confident I am doing something wrong in measuring this current but am not sure what. Help/advice?

You need the measuring device to have a much higher input impedance than the resistor that you have connected across the current source. Try using a 1kOhm resistor and use your 1MegOhm input DVM leads across that 1kOhm resistor. You will get 1V/mA from the resistor.
 
Saying in different words:
1ma across 50 ohms = 50mv. The scope 50 ohm input is effectively your measurement resistor. Set the scope to high impedance. The isolation unit would then need to supply 100 volts to get 1 ma across 100K. Drop the 100K to 500 ohms and you should see 0.5V.
 
Hi Berkemen/meBigGuy -

I appreciate the concise response. I have a few theoretical questions (just to help understand this better):

1. Berkemen - When I try your approach, my oscilloscope can't measure the voltage of the signal because the signal is too high in amplitude for the screen - and since Agilent scopes use the digital screen to measure it, it just shows me some random "greater than" value. I can do your approach with a standard Agilent multimeter, but don't understand how to measure it using an oscilloscope due to the aforementioned issue.

I'm still fuzzy on the meaning of impedance. I have read a lot about it and understand the math, but not the physical implications of it. Any explanations you can offer are appreciated.

2. meBigGuy - I originally calculated the current using the formula you state: 50mV/50ohms = 1mA. However I would like to measure the current output using a 100KOhm load on the output. As I mentioned above, the oscope can't measure the voltage on that because the volts/div don't fit (i.e. can't get 100V to fit onto the screen). How do you overcome such an issue when measuring with the scope? is it even possible since there is a built in 50ohm resistor in the scope?

Apologies in advance if anything is terribly incorrect or novice.
 
If the scope input is 50 ohms only, then you can simply put the 100K resistor in series with it. (or find a 99.950K ohm resistor). When there is 100V on the resistor, you will see 50mV on the scope.

Does your source actually produce 100V for a 1V input?
 
yapatel said:
1. Berkemen - When I try your approach, my oscilloscope can't measure the voltage of the signal because the signal is too high in amplitude for the screen - and since Agilent scopes use the digital screen to measure it, it just shows me some random "greater than" value. I can do your approach with a standard Agilent multimeter, but don't understand how to measure it using an oscilloscope due to the aforementioned issue.

1V is too big for your oscilloscope? 1mA through 1kOhm is 1V.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 78 ·
3
Replies
78
Views
6K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
6K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
7K