Measuring Hyperfine Interactions: Artemis' University Challenge

artemisf
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello,
my name is Artemis. These days I study at University of Science and Technology in Cracow. Due to the fact that semester is almost over one of my tutors asked me to do a quick presentation about "Ways of measuring hyperfine interactions". I would appreciate it a lot if anyone of you could help me with this subject by just by mentioning me the ways how to do it, as I need to write about 6 methods and I can't find even one. Please help me.

Thank you in advance,
Aremis.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you tried Wikipedia as a starting point?
 
Yes, I did. But I didn't find anything useful.
 
You could ask your tutor to suggest a source, a book or journal papers perhaps could help.
 
Off the top of my head, look into nuclear magnetic resonance, nuclear quadrupole resonance, electron paramagnetic resonance and Mossbauer spectroscopy to start with.
 
Here is a quote from wikipedia:

"Hyperfine interactions can be measured, among other ways, in atomic and molecular spectra and in electron paramagnetic resonance spectra of free radicals and transition-metal ions"

So you can begin researching all of those methods as well as on top of what kuruman has said. And NMR is a very popular method which kuruman listed.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top