I Measuring Low Resistance: Why Meter Bridge is the Preferred Choice

AI Thread Summary
The meter bridge is preferred over the post office box for measuring low resistance due to its superior sensitivity and accuracy. The post office box, which operates as a Wheatstone bridge, is limited in its measurement range and primarily used for identifying short circuits rather than measuring resistance. Its design does not effectively utilize the meter's sensitivity because it is affected by the bridge components. Additionally, the meter bridge allows for a more precise measurement technique by enabling current to pass through the meter for full-scale deflection before measuring the voltage drop across an unknown low resistance. Overall, the meter bridge is more effective for low resistance measurements compared to the post office box.
phymath7
Messages
48
Reaction score
4
TL;DR Summary
Why post office box can't be used to measure high or low resistance?
Why meter bridge is chosen over post office box to measure low resistance?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is "post office box" (or "vox")?
 
Ah. According to the Wikipedia article the Post Office Box (origin UK) is in fact a Wheatstone bridge circuit.
 
phymath7 said:
TL;DR Summary: Why post office box can't be used to measure high or low resistance?

Why meter bridge is chosen over post office box to measure low resistance?
Who says it can't be used to measure high or low resistance ?
The post office box was two arms of a Wheatstone bridge.
It was used to find short circuits, not open breaks in the line.
 
phymath7 said:
TL;DR Summary: Why post office box can't be used to measure high or low resistance?

Why meter bridge is chosen over post office box to measure low resistance?
I think the measurement range will be limited by the available ratio arms and standard resistances. In addition, a bridge does not make best use of the meter sensitivity because it is shunted by the bridge components. There is a sensitive method for low resistances where we first pass a current through the meter to give full scale deflection and then measure the drop in reading when the meter is shunted by the unknown low resistance.
(Sorry, I recently disposed of my copy of "Telephony", by Herbert and Proctor, which would have given the definitive answer).
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Hello! I am generating electrons from a 3D gaussian source. The electrons all have the same energy, but the direction is isotropic. The electron source is in between 2 plates that act as a capacitor, and one of them acts as a time of flight (tof) detector. I know the voltage on the plates very well, and I want to extract the center of the gaussian distribution (in one direction only), by measuring the tof of many electrons. So the uncertainty on the position is given by the tof uncertainty...
Back
Top