Measuring Low Resistance: Why Meter Bridge is the Preferred Choice

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
5 replies · 2K views
phymath7
Messages
48
Reaction score
4
TL;DR
Why post office box can't be used to measure high or low resistance?
Why meter bridge is chosen over post office box to measure low resistance?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ah. According to the Wikipedia article the Post Office Box (origin UK) is in fact a Wheatstone bridge circuit.
 
phymath7 said:
TL;DR Summary: Why post office box can't be used to measure high or low resistance?

Why meter bridge is chosen over post office box to measure low resistance?
Who says it can't be used to measure high or low resistance ?
The post office box was two arms of a Wheatstone bridge.
It was used to find short circuits, not open breaks in the line.
 
phymath7 said:
TL;DR Summary: Why post office box can't be used to measure high or low resistance?

Why meter bridge is chosen over post office box to measure low resistance?
I think the measurement range will be limited by the available ratio arms and standard resistances. In addition, a bridge does not make best use of the meter sensitivity because it is shunted by the bridge components. There is a sensitive method for low resistances where we first pass a current through the meter to give full scale deflection and then measure the drop in reading when the meter is shunted by the unknown low resistance.
(Sorry, I recently disposed of my copy of "Telephony", by Herbert and Proctor, which would have given the definitive answer).