Measuring Projectile Efficiency: Is 51% Accurate?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on measuring the efficiency of a rubber bouncy ball shot from a slingshot, with an efficiency calculation yielding 51%. This figure is derived by comparing the real range achieved to the ideal range, factoring in conditions like air resistance. Participants confirm that the method of calculating efficiency is sound, suggesting the use of theoretical models to establish ideal conditions. The formula for range, incorporating velocity and angle, is also mentioned as a means to further refine efficiency calculations. Overall, the approach to measuring projectile efficiency is deemed viable and accurate.
donkeycopter
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I have a rubber bouncy ball which is shot off a ramp using a rubber band slingshot.

I've calculated the ideal range, and then measured the real range. By dividing the real by ideal and multiplying by 100, I get a 51% efficiency.

Does that sound viable?

How else can I measure the efficiency of the device?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
donkeycopter said:
Does that sound viable?

Yes. Since you measured your range, you can work sort of find an ideal situation (one without air resistance) to give you the value you measured. So it works out the same as you did it.


Range = \frac{v^2sin2\theta}{g}
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top