Measuring Solid Angle of Cuboid: Steradians

  • Thread starter Thread starter Atran
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To measure the solid angle of a cuboid, the discussion focuses on the relationship between steradians and the geometry of the shape. The total solid angle for a sphere is 4π steradians, while the cuboid's solid angle is being debated in terms of its volume and dimensions. The user initially suggests a formula involving a cuboid's volume but later corrects their approach, emphasizing that the solid angle should not be calculated using 360 degrees squared. The final goal is to determine the solid angle at a specific point within the cuboid without using the incorrect method of 360^2. Accurate measurement of solid angles for non-spherical shapes like cuboids requires a different mathematical approach than that used for spheres.
Atran
Messages
93
Reaction score
1
Hi, How can I measure one solid angle of a cuboid, at least a non-sphere shape?
I've read about steradians on internet, so I haven't studied it in any textbook.

Thanks...
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
A cuboid with the sides (a), (b) and (c).
I think the total steradians of it is 3602=(129600*π)/360=720π

V = a*b*c
V = (4π(r3))/3

((3*a*b*c)/4π)(1/3) = r
((3*a*b*c)/4π)(2/3) = r2

((3*a*b*c)/4π)(2/3) * 720π = A

Is that procedure correct?
 
Last edited:
Atran said:
I think the total steradians of it is 3602=(129600*π)/360=720π
I wrote incorrect above, right?
If a circle and a rectangle have totally 360 degrees, therefore a sphere has the same amount of degrees (4π) as a cuboid has.

So this should be incorrect ((3*a*b*c)/4π)(2/3) * 720π = A),
and the correct one should be: ((3*a*b*c)/4π)(2/3)) * 4π = A

All I want is to measure one point's degrees in a cuboid.
 
Last edited:
Don't use 360^2. That would be stedegrees or something. Not steradians.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top