Measuring Spin - wave function collapse

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 3K views
benbenny
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
It is my understanding that a measurement of [tex]S_z[/tex] followed by a measurement of [tex]S_y[/tex] will result in a particle which is in an eigenstate of [tex]S_y[/tex]. But it appears that a measurement of say [tex]S_y[/tex] followed by a measurement of [tex]S_x[/tex] results in zero. I see this from a question in which I am asked to find the expectation value of [tex]S_x[/tex] for a particle in an eigenstate of [tex]S_y[/tex] and my result is zero. But for [tex]S_z[/tex] it is non zero.
I don't understand why this is so. Could someone help me understand why we find non zero [tex]S_z[/tex] values but zero [tex]S_x[/tex] values for a partilce in an [tex]S_y[/tex] eigenstate.

Thanks in advance.

B
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Taking a measurement is not the same as finding the expectation value. If you take a measurement of Sx or Sz, you'll always get 1/2 or -1/2 (in units of h-bar). The expectation value is what you'd expect if you took many measurements and averaged the results.
 
vela said:
Taking a measurement is not the same as finding the expectation value. If you take a measurement of Sx or Sz, you'll always get 1/2 or -1/2 (in units of h-bar). The expectation value is what you'd expect if you took many measurements and averaged the results.

Ok. I understand now. Thank you Vela.

It makes sense that the expectation value in the [tex]S_z[/tex] direction is NOT zero even if we are in a quantum state of [tex]S_x[/tex] or [tex]S_y[/tex] since it is the "preferred" direction I suppose, while [tex]S_x[/tex] and [tex]S_y[/tex] should exhibit zero expectation if we are in the [tex]S_z[/tex] eigenstate as they sort of rotate around [tex]S_z[/tex].
or something like that. cheers.
 
If you're in an eigenstate of Sx, the preferred direction is along the x-axis. You should find the expectation values of Sy and Sz to be zero.

Keep in mind that x, y, and z are just labels we use to keep things straight. There's nothing intrinsically special about the z-axis.
 
vela said:
If you're in an eigenstate of Sx, the preferred direction is along the x-axis. You should find the expectation values of Sy and Sz to be zero.

Keep in mind that x, y, and z are just labels we use to keep things straight. There's nothing intrinsically special about the z-axis.

oh ok. now I think I really do understand. Source of confusion: hypothetical triple stern-gerlach experiment which exhibits that taking a measurement of Sx on an Sz eigenstate beam would produce 2 more beams in eigenstates of Sx. Obviously 2 resulting beams in the up and down eigenstates of Sx still amount to a zero expectation value.

Thanks again Vela, and if your interested in helping me with another unrelated question regarding GR and the cylinder condition that would be great as well : https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=399738

cheers.

B