Measuring tension in a nylon loop (springs?)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on measuring the tension in a nylon loop used in a surgical prosthesis, which is crucial for stabilizing two bones. The user is considering using a spring with a known constant to measure tension, but seeks clarification on whether a spring should be attached to both ends of the loop. Suggestions include using a strain gauge, although the nylon's thickness limits options for internal measurements. The user is open to alternative methods for measuring tension without compromising the loop's integrity. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the need for practical and effective measurement techniques in a constrained environment.
Dunnymel
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Warning: I have a minor grasp of physics...
I am devising a study looking at the tension required in a surgical prosthesis (which is essentially a length of nylon with 80LB breaking strain) to produce stability between 2 bones.
The nylon will be placed in a simple loop between 2 structures and I want to tighten the loop until I have produced the desired effect. In practice this means placing the loop, then forming a single knot and applying tension to each end of the loop (ie the first part of tying a shoelace) before securing the loop with additional 'throws' .
Importantly I want to measure the tension that I have produced in the loop.
The loop will be quite small (say 3cm diam) and sitting against tissue which means I will not be able to place a gauge or other device within the loop unless the device is very small.
I was thinking of using a spring with a known constant attached to the ends of the nylon which could be measured once I have the desired physical effect.
Is this the simplest way of measuring the tension in my loop? If so, do I need a spring attached to both ends of the loop as I tension it?

Thanks

Dunnymel
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Dunnymel. Welcome to the board. I'm not a strain gauge expert, in fact I've never used one. But the idea is simple enough. Strain of a copper conductor changes the resistance, and the resistance can be measured. Here's an overview:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strain_gauge

If you had an extremely thin wire wrapped inside the nylon (string?) you might be able to measure any change in resistance as the nylon stretched. Obviously, the longer the copper, the more accurate you can get, so there's going to be a tradeoff in how complicated you get with the geometry of the wire (ie: how long you can make it) and how accurate you want it. Figure out how accurate you need it, then have someone expert in the field figure out how long it needs to be and how you might be able to mount it.
 
Thanks, you've just profoundly increased my knowledge on the subject of strain gauges!

..however the nylon I am using is akin to heavy fishing line, about 1.5mm diam, so I can't place anything 'inside'. I would have to use something on the outside surface.

Any other ideas would be great.

Dunnymel.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top