Measuring the electron mobility of a molecule

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on measuring electron mobility in a device with multiple layers, specifically how adding a fourth layer affects conductivity and mobility. The participant notes that while conductivity increases, the charge carrier density also changes, complicating the calculation of mobility. They mention that the IV curves are non-linear, making it difficult to apply Ohm's law directly. Suggestions include converting conductivity to resistivity and using Taylor expansion to approximate resistance at specific voltages. The conversation emphasizes the need for a deeper understanding of electronic structure and material interfaces to accurately assess mobility changes.
warfreak131
Messages
186
Reaction score
0
Hello PF

Let's say I have a device with three layers, A, B, and C, where layers A and C are the anode and cathode.

I can measure the IV curves from that device easily. Now let's say I added a fourth layer, D, in between A and B. Layer D interacts with layer B such that it increases it's conductivity.

So if I measure the IV curves again, I should get an increase in I for a given V. From looking up some equations on mobility, I know I can characterize the mobility as *sigma* = n e *mu*.

Now I would normally say that if I get a doubling of conductivity, I would get a doubling of mobility, but the charge carrier density, n, is different since I added the fourth layer D. So how could I figure out my exact increase in mobility?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is this STM stuff?

Go back to ohms law here. Convert the conductivity (sigma) to resistivity (R) and then add up all the resistivities. You might have to solve a set of 2 or more equations here.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
What I have is a layer of Indium Tin Oxide as the anode, a molecule in between, and gold as the cathode. When I run the IV curve of it, it isn't a linear relationship. The closest way I can approximate the behavior is like sqrt(x) or 1-e^(-x). the slope is constantly changing, so I don't know if I can apply ohms law.
 
Good point. You can't directly apply ohms law. The IV curves you're studying intimately depend on the electronic structure and material interface, so you might have to dive down the rabbit hole here, and really develop an understanding of electronic structure.

You may still be able to apply ohms law at specific points along the IV curve by Taylor expanding the resistances about a specific voltage there. Doing this for all voltages will give you a hodge podge of approximations as opposed to one nice equation, though.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top