Measuring the Force Required to Separate Two Magnets at a Distance

AI Thread Summary
To separate two magnets or a magnet from metal, a force measurement can be taken using a spring scale. A reading of 10 grams translates to approximately 0.1 Newtons of force, as 10 grams corresponds to 0.1 Newtons under Earth's gravity. However, the force required to separate the magnets is not constant and decreases with increasing distance, complicating energy calculations. To determine energy, one must consider the work done, which involves integrating the varying force over the distance of separation. Accurate measurements and possibly a test rig are necessary for precise energy calculations.
Dion
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi, i have a question.

I need to know how much Newton it takes to separate 2 magnets or a magnet from a from a piece of metal.

I've bought a spring scale that measures max 50 gram, so very accurate.

Now what if i attach the scale to the magnet and i pull it horizontally just enough to separate the magnets and the meter reads 10 gram, does it then mean it took 0.001 Newton to separate the magnets? And i can use that to convert it into watthours to have a mechanim separate the magnet with that amount of watthours?

Really appreciate the answers
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Dion said:
I've bought a spring scale that measures max 50 gram, so very accurate.
The maximum scale reading on a measurement device is only weak evidence for the accuracy or precision of the device. But yes, we can plausibly assume that this scale is good to at least plus or minus one gram.
Now what if i attach the scale to the magnet and i pull it horizontally just enough to separate the magnets and the meter reads 10 gram, does it then mean it took 0.001 Newton to separate the magnets?
Hmmm. If 1 kg is 10 Newtons then 0.1 kg is 1 Newton. 0.01 kg (10 grams) is 0.1 Newton. I think you divided by g when you should have multiplied.
And i can use that to convert it into watthours to have a mechanim separate the magnet with that amount of watthours?
You've measured the force required to initially separate the magnet from the piece of metal. You have not measured the separation that you obtained as a result.

If you want to take the measured force and convert it to an amount of energy you could use the fact that Work = Force * Distance.

But the force is not constant (it drops off rapidly with increasing separation). So you would have to integrate instantaneous force times incremental distance along a path from the initial state (no separation) to the final state (large or infinite separation).
 
jbriggs444 said:
The maximum scale reading on a measurement device is only weak evidence for the accuracy or precision of the device. But yes, we can plausibly assume that this scale is good to at least plus or minus one gram.

Hmmm. If 1 kg is 10 Newtons then 0.1 kg is 1 Newton. 0.01 kg (10 grams) is 0.1 Newton. I think you divided by g when you should have multiplied.

You've measured the force required to initially separate the magnet from the piece of metal. You have not measured the separation that you obtained as a result.

If you want to take the measured force and convert it to an amount of energy you could use the fact that Work = Force * Distance.

But the force is not constant (it drops off rapidly with increasing separation). So you would have to integrate instantaneous force times incremental distance along a path from the initial state (no separation) to the final state (large or infinite separation).
I think i used Newton-meter for the equation, 10 gram is +- 0.001 Newton meter. But is this not correct to measure the force to separate the magnets then? How else would be a correct way to calculate it? And if Newton meters per second is correct shouldn't i need to divide 0.001 by 100 since i only move it +- 1cm instead of 1 meter?
Thanks for the help
 
Dion said:
I think i used Newton-meter for the equation, 10 gram is +- 0.001 Newton meter.
grams measure mass. Newton-meters measure energy (or torque). As is, the above equation is not dimensionally consistent. It is nonsense.

The first step is to take that 10 grams and convert to 0.1 Newtons of force. This is justified because the scale is intended for use on the surface of the Earth where the acceleration of gravity is approximately 10 meters/second2. A 10 gram reading is indicative of the presence of 0.1 Newtons of force.

The second step would be to take that 0.1 Newtons of force and multiply it by the distance over which the force acts. 0.1 Newtons applied over 0.01 meters is indeed 0.001 Newton meters of work energy = 0.001 Joules = 0.001 Watt-second.

But that assumes that the force is uniform from direct contact out to 1 cm separation. Is it?
 
Dion said:
I think i used Newton-meter for the equation, 10 gram is +- 0.001 Newton meter.
Grams and Newton-meters (and watt-hours) are not directly related units. That conversion is wrong/meaningless.
But is this not correct to measure the force to separate the magnets then? How else would be a correct way to calculate it? And if Newton meters per second is correct shouldn't i need to divide 0.001 by 100 since i only move it +- 1cm instead of 1 meter?
Thanks for the help
If you want the force, measure it and then you are done. If you want energy, there is no easy way to measure that. You will probably need to build some sort of test rig.
 
jbriggs444 said:
grams measure mass. Newton-meters measure energy (or torque). As is, the above equation is not dimensionally consistent. It is nonsense.

The first step is to take that 10 grams and convert to 0.1 Newtons of force. This is justified because the scale is intended for use on the surface of the Earth where the acceleration of gravity is approximately 10 meters/second2. A 10 gram reading is indicative of the presence of 0.1 Newtons of force.

The second step would be to take that 0.1 Newtons of force and multiply it by the distance over which the force acts. 0.1 Newtons applied over 0.01 meters is indeed 0.001 Newton meters of work energy = 0.001 Joules = 0.001 Watt-second.

But that assumes that the force is uniform from direct contact out to 1 cm separation. Is it?
Thanks for the reply,

Yes it is +- 1cm, in my setup the magnet doesn't touch the metal, the magnet is attached to an arm and the metal it attracts is +- 3cm away from the magnet holding it just in place against an plastic wall. When i move the magnet 1cm away from from the metal the metal drops and its seperated. Thats why the force to move the magnet is so low.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top