Measuring time delay before charged plates repel

In summary, the conversation discusses the possibility of measuring a delay in the electrostatic repulsion between two parallel conducting plates when they are charged simultaneously. It is suggested that the delay may be too small and the effect too weak to be measured experimentally using mechanical deflection of the plates. Alternately, it is proposed that using electronic field detectors may be a more effective method. The conversation concludes by mentioning the specifications of an Electric Field Meter that claims to be able to measure a surface voltage of 1 volt at a distance of 1/10 meter, making it possible to detect a 1 MV electrode at a distance of 100 meters. Overall, the conversation highlights the challenges and potential methods for measuring the delay in electrostatic repulsion between
  • #1
johne1618
371
0
Imagine two parallel conducting plates set at a distance of several meters.

If one charges the two plates simultaneously then one would expect a small delay before they started repelling each other due to the time it takes changes in the static field to propagate from one plate to the other.

Could one experimentally measure such a delay?

I guess it would be so small and the deflection of the plates would be so weak that the effect would be unmeasureable.

I don't know if one could use electronic field detectors rather than rely on the mechanical deflection of the plates.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
How do you plan to charge the plates instantaneously?
 
  • #3
Vanadium 50 said:
How do you plan to charge the plates instantaneously?

I was imagining that the separation of the plates was much larger than their dimensions so that the time it takes to charge the plates is small compared to the delay time in the electrostatic repulsion.

I guess this would mean that the repulsion would be very weak in that case.
 
  • #4
That's a very hard experiment to perform successfully. The fields propagate at the speed of light (because it is light)
 
  • #5
I've looked up the specifications of an Electric Field Meter (JCI140 Field Mill Static Monitor from Chilworth Technology) and the manufacturers say that it can measure a surface voltage of 1 volt at a distance of 1/10 meter.

Therefore if one charged up an electrode to 1 MV then according to the inverse square law it should be just detectable at a distance of 100 meters.

The time delay for light to travel 100 meters is about [itex]3\times 10^{-7}[/itex]secs which would be easily measured with a GHz electronic oscillator.
 

1. How is time delay before charged plates repel measured?

The time delay before charged plates repel can be measured using a stopwatch or a timer. The experiment involves charging two plates with opposite charges and recording the time it takes for them to repel each other.

2. What is the purpose of measuring time delay before charged plates repel?

The purpose of this measurement is to understand the relationship between the strength of the electric field and the distance between the plates. It can also be used to calculate the charge and mass of particles in an electric field.

3. How does the distance between the plates affect the time delay before repulsion?

The distance between the plates directly affects the strength of the electric field. The stronger the electric field, the faster the plates will repel. Therefore, the time delay before repulsion will decrease as the distance between the plates increases.

4. What factors can affect the accuracy of measuring time delay before charged plates repel?

The accuracy of the measurement can be affected by external factors such as air resistance, friction between the plates, and the precision of the timing device used. It is important to control these factors to ensure accurate results.

5. Can this experiment be used to measure the speed of light?

No, this experiment cannot be used to measure the speed of light. The speed of light is much faster than the repulsion of charged plates, and this experiment is not precise enough to measure such high speeds.

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
858
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
18
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
1
Views
719
Replies
7
Views
1K
Back
Top