Measuring Vibration Excitation Radius & Alpha Parametar

Petar Mali
Messages
283
Reaction score
0
When we have vibration excitation then the radius of nucleus is define like:
R=R_0[1+\sum^{\infty}_{\lambda=0}\sum^{\lambda}_{\mu=-\lambda}\alpha_{\lambda\mu}Y^{\lambda}_{\mu}(\theta,\phi)]

where \alpha_{\lambda,\mu}=\alpha_{\lambda,-\mu} and \alpha_{\lambda,\mu}=\alpha_{\lambda,\mu}(t)

How you measure this \alpha parametar?

Y^{\mu}_{\lambda}=\frac{(-1)^{\mu+\lambda}}{2^{\lambda}\lambda!}\sqrt{\frac{2\lambda+1}{4\pi}\frac{(\lambda-\mu)!}{(\lambda+\mu)!}}e^{i\mu\varphi}(sin\Theta)^{\frac{\mu}{2}}\frac{d^{\mu+\lambda}}{d(cos\Theta)^{\mu+\lambda}}sin^{2\lambda}(\Theta)

And more:
Kinetic energy of system is define like:

T=\frac{1}{2}\sum_{\lambda,\mu}B_{\lambda}|\frac{d \alpha_{\lambda,\mu}}{d t}|^2

Rayleight use \rho=\frac{3M}{4R^3_0\pi}, and get B_{\lambda}=\frac{3MR^2_0}{4\pi\lambda}. How?

Thanks for answers
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Which book, what have you tried? ..
 
Well this is from book "Osnovi nuklearne fizike" - Lazar Marinkov. I tried Burcham and some book of Gamov. From the Marinkov's book I think that this is given in reference P. Ring and P. Schuck, The Nuclear Many-Body Problem (Springer-Verlag, New York, Heidelberg, Berlin, 1980) but I don't have this book.
 
The first equation is just a decomposition of a generic function defined on a sphere in terms of spherical harmonics Y. Like a Fourier transform, but on a sphere. \alpha's are decomposition coefficients.

Y's, though scary looking, are normalized so that the integral of |Y|^2 over the entire sphere is something simple (there are a few different definitions, one common definition is that \int |Y|^2 d\Omega = 1. I can't tell right away which one is used by your book.) If you assume that only one of \alpha's is nonzero and make certain assumptions about the nuclear matter, perhaps that non-excited nucleus is a homogeneous sphere of density \rho, deformed according to the formula above, and make assumptions about velocity distribution, and you compute kinetic energy by integrating over the entire volume, you'll get an equation that expresses B in terms of \rho.
 
Thanks for answering.
In that series is \alpha perhaps complex functions in general?
 
Thread 'Why is there such a difference between the total cross-section data? (simulation vs. experiment)'
Well, I'm simulating a neutron-proton scattering phase shift. The equation that I solve numerically is the Phase function method and is $$ \frac{d}{dr}[\delta_{i+1}] = \frac{2\mu}{\hbar^2}\frac{V(r)}{k^2}\sin(kr + \delta_i)$$ ##\delta_i## is the phase shift for triplet and singlet state, ##\mu## is the reduced mass for neutron-proton, ##k=\sqrt{2\mu E_{cm}/\hbar^2}## is the wave number and ##V(r)## is the potential of interaction like Yukawa, Wood-Saxon, Square well potential, etc. I first...
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top