Mech - Girder Section - Picture included

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chantry09
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Picture Section
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a mechanics problem involving a girder section and the balance of weights on either side. It questions whether the weights are equal or if they should be calculated using dimensions represented by letters. Participants clarify that the weights are not equal and suggest using moments to analyze the situation, even without specific distances. A method is proposed to simplify calculations by assuming equal distances for the triangular sections. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding support structures and encourages using unit assumptions for solving the problem.
Chantry09
Messages
59
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



http://img132.imageshack.us/img132/8958/mechanicsgv3.jpg

The Attempt at a Solution



(i) Is the weight balanced on both sides in a situation like this, in which case it would be:

(6000 +3000) / 2 = 4500N on A and 4500N on G

Or are the weights not equal and infact I am meant to work it out with dimensions in terms of letters, for example A-C?

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(ii) Could anyone tell me where i can learn about these support structures, i brought a mechanics book but it doesn't cover and after looking on the internet i can't find any good sources of information to teach me.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Spadez said:
Or are the weights not equal and infact I am meant to work it out with dimensions in terms of letters, for example A-C?

Hi Spadez! :smile:

No, they're not equal.

Hint: take a moment.
 
Ok, so i take moments but i have to use the distance with respect to the letters, I am not given any distances. Can i still do it like that?
 
hmm … assuming the triangles are all the same, just say "let AC = CE = EG = 1 unit" … the units will cancel in the end :smile:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top