Mechanical advantage: lever arm

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving mechanical advantage and lever systems, specifically focusing on how much weight the fulcrum must bear when lifting a 30 kg mass using a massless meter stick. Participants explore the relationships between forces, lever arms, and torques in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of the mechanical advantage formula and its setup, questioning the calculations leading to different force values. There is an exploration of torque concepts and how they relate to the forces acting on the lever system.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active with participants offering insights and corrections regarding the mechanical advantage equation and its derivation from torque principles. There is recognition of the need to calculate both the applied force and the force on the fulcrum, with various interpretations being explored.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express confusion over the expected answer for the force on the fulcrum, noting discrepancies between their calculations and the stated answer. The problem's constraints, such as the assumption of a massless board, are acknowledged but not resolved.

brake4country
Messages
216
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement


In order to lift the 30 kg mass, a Force F is applied to the massless meter stick shown below. How much weight must the fulcrum bear if the mass is to be lifted?

Homework Equations


R/E = l/L

The Attempt at a Solution


So I began with the formula above and this is my set up:

300/F = 0.25/0.75. I got 900 N for F. However, the problem asks about the fulcrum. Logically I would add the 900 N with the 300 N of the resistance force by the mass, I get 1200 N. Since the answer is 400 N, it appears that I have to divide the Force lever arm distance to determine the force on the fulcrum? I think this is the right reasoning here but would appreciate any insight into this problem.
 

Attachments

  • 20160519_124450[1].jpg
    20160519_124450[1].jpg
    15.2 KB · Views: 485
Physics news on Phys.org
brake4country said:
300/F = 0.25/0.75. I got 900 N for F.
Better check that formula. Another way to check: clockwise torques must equal counter-clockwise torques.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: brake4country
If I approach it using torques, it seems counterintuitive to set the center of mass at the fulcrum since the board is massless. The only other alternative is the set the c.m. at the 30 kg block.
 
brake4country said:
If I approach it using torques, it seems counterintuitive to set the center of mass at the fulcrum since the board is massless.
You're not setting the center of mass of anything. You are just choosing a convenient axis of rotation for computing torques. The fulcrum is the natural choice. (But you can use any point.)

Since the board is assumed massless, its weight is irrelevant.
 
brake4country said:

Homework Statement


In order to lift the 30 kg mass, a Force F is applied to the massless meter stick shown below. How much weight must the fulcrum bear if the mass is to be lifted?

Homework Equations


R/E = l/L

The Attempt at a Solution


So I began with the formula above and this is my set up:

300/F = 0.25/0.75. I got 900 N for F. However, the problem asks about the fulcrum. Logically I would add the 900 N with the 300 N of the resistance force by the mass, I get 1200 N. Since the answer is 400 N, it appears that I have to divide the Force lever arm distance to determine the force on the fulcrum? I think this is the right reasoning here but would appreciate any insight into this problem.
The whole point of using a lever is to reduce the effort it takes to lift the 30 kg mass in the first place.

Simply picking up the mass directly would require only applying 300 N to it, which implies that the "answer" of 400 N is wrong. Same for 900 N and 1200 N. Both of those forces greatly exceed the amount of force required to simply lift the 30 kg mass with your bare hands, and avoid having to set up a lever in the first place.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: brake4country and Doc Al
Ok. You all are absolutely right. I set up the mechanical advantage equation wrong. It should be:

R/E=L/l
So, 300 N/E = 0.75/.025

This was originally how I set it up and got 100 N, which makes more sense than 400 N, as you said, since the purpose of M.A. is to reduce the force needed to lift an object. However, the correct answer is 400 N, which to me, is wrong.

By the way, how would I set this up using torques?
 
brake4country said:
This was originally how I set it up and got 100 N, which makes more sense than 400 N, as you said, since the purpose of M.A. is to reduce the force needed to lift an object.
The value of 100 N for the applied force F is correct. And that should make more sense than your earlier value of 900 N. You can apply the same logic you tried before to get the force at the fulcrum.

The mechanical advantage equation is derived using torques.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: brake4country
brake4country said:
Ok. You all are absolutely right. I set up the mechanical advantage equation wrong. It should be:

R/E=L/l
So, 300 N/E = 0.75/.025

This was originally how I set it up and got 100 N, which makes more sense than 400 N, as you said, since the purpose of M.A. is to reduce the force needed to lift an object. However, the correct answer is 400 N, which to me, is wrong.
I spoke too soon in my previous post.

Looking at the problem statement, the question wants to know what the force on the fulcrum is, rather than the value of F. But you still need to calculate F so that you can find the force on the fulcrum. The force on the fulcrum must equal the sum of the weight of the 30 kg block and the applied force F on the other end of the lever.
By the way, how would I set this up using torques?
Torque = force × distance

Find a convenient point about which to calculate the torque (here, the fulcrum is just as convenient as any other point) and write your expressions for the torque each force creates about the reference point. By picking the fulcrum as your reference, whatever force is located there does not create any torque. When calculating torques, make sure you distinguish between clockwise and counterclockwise rotation.
 
Ok! Yes, I looked at the M.A. formula and I see how it is derived from torque. If I cross-multiply the equation I get:

Rl = EL

This makes much more sense. Thank you!
 
  • #10
SteamKing said:
I spoke too soon in my previous post.

Looking at the problem statement, the question wants to know what the force on the fulcrum is, rather than the value of F. But you still need to calculate F so that you can find the force on the fulcrum. The force on the fulcrum must equal the sum of the weight of the 30 kg block and the applied force F on the other end of the lever.

Torque = force × distance

Find a convenient point about which to calculate the torque (here, the fulcrum is just as convenient as any other point) and write your expressions for the torque each force creates about the reference point. By picking the fulcrum as your reference, whatever force is located there does not create any torque. When calculating torques, make sure you distinguish between clockwise and counterclockwise rotation.

Ok, since this is a massless board and we now know that force applied is 100 N, the weight of the box is 300 N. Thus, the force on the fulcrum is the sum of these two forces.
 
  • #11
brake4country said:
Ok, since this is a massless board and we now know that force applied is 100 N, the weight of the box is 300 N. Thus, the force on the fulcrum is the sum of these two forces.
Correct.
 
  • #12
brake4country said:
Ok, since this is a massless board and we now know that force applied is 100 N, the weight of the box is 300 N. Thus, the force on the fulcrum is the sum of these two forces.
Good.

Just for fun, try solving this a different way: Calculate torques about the end of the board (where F is applied).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K