Mechanical engineering mechanics question: Motions of a triangular plate

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a mechanical engineering problem involving the motions of a triangular plate, specifically addressing the calculations of angular velocity and the relationships between various components of the system. Participants are exploring the theoretical and mathematical aspects of the problem, including the application of relevant equations and the implications of the geometry of the triangle.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant calculates angular velocity using the formula \( \omega = v/r \) and arrives at a value of 1.5 rad/s for part a, but expresses uncertainty about the correctness of this answer.
  • Another participant questions the assumptions made regarding the axis of rotation and the dependency of the answer on the angle \( \beta \).
  • There is a discussion about the need for the tangential velocity component in the equation \( \vec v = \vec \omega \times \vec r \), suggesting that not all velocities can be used interchangeably.
  • Participants discuss the implications of the triangle's movement, noting that even if side CB is vertical, the system is still rotating, which affects the angular velocity.
  • One participant expresses confusion about the relationship between the angular velocities of different segments of the triangle and whether they are the same.
  • There is a suggestion that the problem may have been designed to lead participants through a specific reasoning process, with some participants speculating on the intentions behind the problem's structure.
  • A later reply introduces the concept of the time derivative of the angle \( \beta \) and its relationship to the system's rotation, prompting further exploration of how to calculate angular velocity at a specific moment.
  • One participant attempts to calculate the time taken for a movement based on the geometry of the triangle, leading to a proposed value for angular velocity, but expresses uncertainty about the correctness of this calculation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the correctness of the calculations or the assumptions made regarding the motion of the triangular plate. Multiple competing views and uncertainties remain regarding the relationships between the components and the implications of the geometry.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the assumptions made about the axis of rotation, the definitions of velocity used, and the specific conditions under which the calculations are valid. Some mathematical steps remain unresolved, particularly in relation to the angular velocities and their dependencies on the angle \( \beta \).

sophiebeth100
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Shown in picture

Homework Equations


So far just used w=v/r

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
Could only do part a.

W=v/r
=0.3/0.2
=1.5rad/s

For part b I would assume the velocity is zero? But I don't think that's correct. Any help with part b and c would be great, and is part a correct? Thank you :)
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20160504_111321.jpg
    IMG_20160504_111321.jpg
    64.2 KB · Views: 499
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi beth, :welcome:
funny to see 'Shown in picture' for the problem statement, right next to the picture. It doesn't say which half of the picture constitutes the problem :smile:

You sure about your a answer ? Does it mean ##\omega## is in fact constant ?
 
BvU said:
Hi beth, :welcome:
funny to see 'Shown in picture' for the problem statement, right next to the picture. It doesn't say which half of the picture constitutes the problem :smile:

You sure about your a answer ? Does it mean ##\omega## is in fact constant ?
Could you be more specific in regards to my answer for a? Did I use the right formula? Is there a different formula I should be using?
 
I asked first ! Where are your v and r and what is your axis of rotation ? Don't you become suspicious if the answer doesn't seem to depend on ##\beta## ?
 
BvU said:
I asked first ! Where are your v and r and what is your axis of rotation ? Don't you become suspicious if the answer doesn't seem to depend on ##\beta## ?
I used the v for the hydraulic cylinder, 0.3, and the radius 0.2, as the edge of the triangle is.

I think I have found my mistake - I had assumed B was the centre of the circular motion but I now see that B can move and this is wrong. Since there is no fixed point on the triangle, I don't know where to go from here
 
Oh boy, back to the drawing board :nb).

There was something else I wanted to bring up: your equation comes from ##\ \ \vec v = \vec \omega \times \vec r\ \ ##, a vector product. You familiar with that ? In other words, if you want to write ##\omega = v/r## you can't just take any ##v##: you need the tangential velocity (the component perpendicular to ##\vec r##).

With that, do you now see an opening to get going with this exercise ?
 
BvU said:
Oh boy, back to the drawing board :nb).

There was something else I wanted to bring up: your equation comes from ##\ \ \vec v = \vec \omega \times \vec r\ \ ##, a vector product. You familiar with that ? In other words, if you want to write ##\omega = v/r## you can't just take any ##v##: you need the tangential velocity (the component perpendicular to ##\vec r##).

With that, do you now see an opening to get going with this exercise ?

I see. So when beta=30, the side CB is vertical. However, since CB=r, wouldn't the perpendicular velocity=0, since the machine only operates up and down?
 
Yes, they made a deceiving drawing. On purpose ?
Even if CB is vertical, the thing is rotating when A moves upwards: B moves to the right. So ##\omega \ne 0##.

Can you see a relation between ##\omega## of CD and ##\omega## of BA ? :smile:

[edit] typo: between ##\omega## of CB and ##\omega## of BA
 
Last edited:
sophiebeth100 said:
However, since CB=r, wouldn't the perpendicular velocity=0, since the machine only operates up and down?
Not because the machine only operates up and down. But because B only moves horizontally. So if you answer b) first you do have an answer for a) -- but you have to take into account that C also moves !
But perhaps the composer of the exercise wasn't that devious after all and gave you part a) first for a reason...
 
  • #10
BvU said:
Yes, they made a deceiving drawing. On purpose ?
Even if CB is vertical, the thing is rotating when A moves upwards: B moves to the right. So ##\omega \ne 0##.

Can you see a relation between ##\omega## of CD and ##\omega## of BA ? :smile:

Do you mean of CB and BA? But hmm are they the same?
 
  • #11
Very good. Next step: any relation with ##\beta## ?
 
  • #12
BvU said:
Very good. Next step: any relation with ##\beta## ?

I really can't find a relationship between those two things
 
  • #13
What can you say about ##\beta## if the triangle does not rotate (only translates) ?
 
  • #14
BvU said:
What can you say about ##\beta## if the triangle does not rotate (only translates) ?

The value stays the same?
 
  • #15
Yes. So what is ##{d\over dt} \beta## when it rotates ?
 
  • #16
BvU said:
Yes. So what is ##{d\over dt} \beta## when it rotates ?

Is that the change in β related to time? Where does time come into it?
 
  • #17
You want ##\omega## at the moment that ##\beta = {\pi/6}##. A is moving, remember ?
Do you know the definition of ##\omega## ? It is the time derivative of an angle. What angle in your exercise ?
 
  • #18
BvU said:
You want ##\omega## at the moment that ##\beta = {\pi/6}##. A is moving, remember ?
Do you know the definition of ##\omega## ? It is the time derivative of an angle. What angle in your exercise ?

Ah I see, so ω=dθ/dt

So to calculate the time, use time = distance / speed.
Not 100% sure on this, but is the distance 0.1m? Since it is half the height of one side of the triangle?
If that's right, time = 0.1/0.3 = 0.33s

ω=dθ/dt
ω=(π/6)/0.33
ω=π/2 rad/s

Is this right?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K