Mechanical equivalent of a coil

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the mechanical analogs of electrical components, specifically focusing on the relationship between mechanical systems (like springs and masses) and electrical systems (like RCL circuits). Participants explore the equivalence of mechanical and electrical properties, particularly in terms of harmonic motion and inductance.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that a swing or mass on a spring behaves similarly to an RCL circuit, proposing that mechanical velocity could be equivalent to current and asking for the mechanical equivalent of a coil.
  • Another participant questions the assumptions made, indicating that while spring compliance may relate to capacitance, a spring should not be considered equivalent to a capacitor and asks about the relationship between mass and inductance.
  • Further exploration is suggested regarding whether inductance could be analogous to the elasticity of the spring under a different analogy.
  • One participant proposes that folding a conductive wire into a coil increases inductance without increasing the wire's length and questions if a similar concept could apply to "mechanical inductance" (mass) without actually increasing mass.
  • Another participant expresses uncertainty about their understanding and suggests researching "mechanical analog inductance" or "mechanical analog capacitance" for further clarity.
  • A participant shares a resource that helped clarify some concepts but still questions the analogy between folding a wire into a coil and rolling an object on a table.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the validity of the analogies presented, with no consensus reached on the equivalence of mechanical and electrical components or the specific relationships between them.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight assumptions regarding the analogies and the need for refinement in their comparisons, indicating potential limitations in their reasoning or definitions.

Yoni
Messages
65
Reaction score
1
Hi. This is a simple one (I think):

We all know a swing, or simple mass on a spring, moves in harmonic motion, and has a specific resonative frequency. We also know that the RCL circuit (which includes a coil and a capacitor) reacts similarly to an external oscillator, also with a specific frequency which gives the highest output. Both systems are equivalents, right?
So my question is: If we decide the mechanical velocity is equivalent to the current, and the spring equivalent to the capacitor, what is the mechanical equivalent of a coil?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your question makes some assumptions that might need refined. We might say, for example, that the spring compliance is analogous to capacitance, but I would not say that a spring is equivalent to a capacitor. But, that aside, do you see any relationship between the mass and inductance?
 
Thanks for your amendment.
Mass, ha? Yes, this is what I thought. This is all under the analogy that velocity transforms to current. Can you therefore somehow conclude that under a different analogy that inductance would be like the elasticity of the spring (I mean with regards to current being analogous to some other variable)? Or is the previous analogy the only valid one?
 
Also, regarding the original analogy: taking a long conductive wire and folding it in circles, creating a coil, would increase inductance without lengthening the wire... am I right? Is there a way to increase "mechanical inductance" (meaning mass) without actually increasing mass itself?

If my assumptions above are correct, I thought that putting the mass on a table and rolling it with static friction generating angular momentum would accomplish that. Are my thoughts correct?
 
Yoni said:
Also, regarding the original analogy: taking a long conductive wire and folding it in circles, creating a coil, would increase inductance without lengthening the wire... am I right? Is there a way to increase "mechanical inductance" (meaning mass) without actually increasing mass itself?

If my assumptions above are correct, I thought that putting the mass on a table and rolling it with static friction generating angular momentum would accomplish that. Are my thoughts correct?

I believe you are correct about other analogies, but I am at least twenty years away from looking at this and feel out of my depth without reviewing. So, I'm going to pass and ask you to Google "mechanical analog inductance" or "mechanical analog capacitance" and see what you find.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
10K
  • · Replies 131 ·
5
Replies
131
Views
9K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K