Mechanical equivalents of electronic things?

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
30 replies · 6K views
Frenemy90210
Only recently, just 2-3 years ago, I discovered Mechanical TV, Mechanical amplifier. I was pleasantly surprised. Mechanical TV was invented by Beard. Mechanical amplifier uses air pump to amplify the sound, completely avoiding any electronics. Also, it seems there exists mechanical frequency filters such as low-pass filters or band pass filters. Edison's phonograph was a mechanical equivalent of today's audio-recording and player machine. Music box that employs camshaft also may be thought of as a mechanical equivalent of an music producing machine from ROM.
I was wondering are there any other such Mechanical equivalents of electronic devices ?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I remember an article about 1966 written by two engineers at GE.
The had built an "Electronic Digital Slide Rule" with Nixie tube readout .
It was awfully big by today's standards - they mounted it in a fishing tackle box which it filled completely.
It did four function arithmetic and transcendentals using rate multipliers which are electronic equivalent of gears.. So it was halfway between binary and analog computing.
They predicted it would be shirt pocket size within a decade. Seemed mighty far fetched at the time.
This is i believe their patent

upload_2017-10-11_23-20-8.png


Sure enough, by 1972 they were on the market.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PaulK2, scottdave and davenn
jim hardy said:
I remember an article about 1966 written by two engineers at GE.
The had built an "Electronic Digital Slide Rule" with Nixie tube readout .
It was awfully big by today's standards - they mounted it in a fishing tackle box which it filled completely.
It did four function arithmetic and transcendentals using rate multipliers which are electronic equivalent of gears.. So it was halfway between binary and analog computing.
They predicted it would be shirt pocket size within a decade. Seemed mighty far fetched at the time.
This is i believe their patent......
.

and the Chinese still like using an abacus :)
 
davenn said:
and the Chinese still like using an abacus :)
Even in the banks, in Japan, they still use Abacus instead of calculators.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: scottdave
The WW II Norden bomb sight employed a mechanical integrator to project the ground impact point for release at any particular moment. IIRC, this was a ball and disk integrator.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Klystron and anorlunda
Frenemy90210 said:
Only recently, just 2-3 years ago, I discovered Mechanical TV, Mechanical amplifier. I was pleasantly surprised. Mechanical TV was invented by Beard. Mechanical amplifier uses air pump to amplify the sound, completely avoiding any electronics. Also, it seems there exists mechanical frequency filters such as low-pass filters or band pass filters. Edison's phonograph was a mechanical equivalent of today's audio-recording and player machine. Music box that employs camshaft also may be thought of as a mechanical equivalent of an music producing machine from ROM.
I was wondering are there any other such Mechanical equivalents of electronic devices ?
An interesting example is the generation of radio waves using an alternator. One such is still in existence at Grimeton, Sweden, and can deliver 200kW at 40kHz. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Varberg_Radio_Station
By the way, the correct name for the TV person is Baird. I met the man who built the first receiving unit for Baird.
 
And that reminds me, what about the video recording which was done on 78rpm records? And how about the mechanical miracle of the video cassette recorder? And the teleprinter? Or the high definition, large screen TV display using an incredibly high speed mechanical scan made by Scophony in about 1938. It used an acoustic light modulator. And then there is the mechanical bombsight computer.
 
In the event of an EMP attack, all would do well to recall these "primitive technologies." They would still work after an EMP, but most of our electronic gadgets will be toast.
 
tech99 said:
An interesting example is the generation of radio waves using an alternator. One such is still in existence at Grimeton, Sweden, and can deliver 200kW at 40kHz. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Varberg_Radio_Station
By the way, the correct name for the TV person is Baird. I met the man who built the first receiving unit for Baird.
To he honest, apart from the fact that the mechanical scanning system was good for describing the principles, the Baird system was hopeless as a broadcasting system. It needed an intermediate film stage and a further scanning of the developed film image. I think it was only xenophobia that forced the BBC to use it in parallel with the Marconi System when Marconi should have been used exclusively from the start.
 
Dr.D said:
In the event of an EMP attack, all would do well to recall these "primitive technologies." They would still work after an EMP, but most of our electronic gadgets will be toast.

It doesn't have to be an attack. Lightning will do the job. EMP from a lightning strike once wiped out all the electronics on my sailboat.

That is why my self-steering uses this mechanical beast rather than the electronic autopilot shown below.
m24.jpg
ST2000%20Autopilot.jpg
 
anorlunda said:
That is why my self-steering uses this mechanical beast rather than the electronic autopilot shown below.
Mechanical beats electronic at sea whenever possible. A wind generator won't supply enough to run an tiller pilot when you are running down wind for hours on end. Your mechanical system will always work if the sails will.
 
Ah, the problem is even closer at hand than I had thought!
 
anorlunda said:
It doesn't have to be an attack. Lightning will do the job. EMP from a lightning strike once wiped out all the electronics on my sailboat.

That is why my self-steering uses this mechanical beast rather than the electronic autopilot shown below.
View attachment 212929 View attachment 212930
And of course, the sextant allows navigation using Nature's "satellites" (just one really, the Moon, together with the Sun and 58 navigational stars).
Regarding Baird and television, he did demonstrate the first working system displaying half tones to Royal Society members in 1926, and broadcasts were made to the public by the BBC using the low definition 30 line system on borrowed AM transmitters from 1929 to 1932. Of course, later implementation was different, but so it is in many fields of innovation - Polio vaccination does not use the killed viruses of the original Salk vaccine, and we communicate without the sparks and coherers of Marconi. For a long time everyone's criticism was that Baird did not use a CRT, and a camera tube, but these are no longer part of television as we know it.
 
Frenemy90210 said:
Only recently, just 2-3 years ago, I discovered Mechanical TV, Mechanical amplifier. ...

Check out: BOBCAT at http://www.tnmoc.org/news/notes-museum/plastic-flip-flops-1970s
 
Dr.D said:
In the event of an EMP attack, all would do well to recall these "primitive technologies." They would still work after an EMP, but most of our electronic gadgets will be toast.

Actually if you read evidence based sources, EMP effects are pretty limited in degree and/or area. Since it's an inverse squared deal and requires a high altitude air burst to maximize coverage area, you don't actually get much bang for the buck (yes, I'm going to hell for that pun) out of EMP attacks.

It gets hyped by political fear mongers who routinely trot out the Hollywood exaggerations, but basically if the electronic device in question can withstand a nearby lightning strike, it's not likely to be phased by an EMP weapon.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_pulse_in_popular_culture

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...y-about-an-emp-attack/?utm_term=.ab268da1958c
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: anorlunda
TheOldFart said:
Actually if you read evidence based sources, EMP effects are pretty limited in degree and/or area. Since it's an inverse squared deal and requires a high altitude air burst to maximize coverage area, you don't actually get much bang for the buck (yes, I'm going to hell for that pun) out of EMP attacks.

And so, we are safe from just how big of an EMP attack? What happens if it is bigger than that?
 
I still run my 65 Mustang 6-cylinder with a home-built points distributor. My car friends think I am nuts, but the spark is longer than the electronic one, and that is why MSD invented Multiple Spark Discharge to duplicate a points arc.

YES, we are talking about a spark...but it is triggered mechanically with points. The 6 has more time to build a charge than a V8 with 6 rather than 8 lobes. Add a hotter coil (100 to 1 windings) with a slightly lower resistance ignition resistor (.8 ohm to 1.4 ohms) and the primary sees a little higher voltage making the output a little more.

My research shows electronics in today's cars is more for controlling emissions, controlling Fuel Injection, shifting automatics, and reducing maintenance for customers. A points spark can take the internal combustion engine well into 7000RPM. Changing points (BWD Select Points, cond., rotor, cap, use best available materials) and with copper plug wires (not recommended with computers) voltage loss to my platinum plugs is minimum. I guess a DIESEL engine would be a better comparison with mechanical compression ignition.
 
Don't forget the acoustic guitar. It worked just fine long before the electric amplified one...but probably would not work in a Heavy Metal band.
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: Klystron
.Scott said:
Check out the AREE robot for Venus exploration:
https://www.wired.com/story/nasa-low-tech-rover/

There was elaborate clockwork before electronics.
In fact, the first computer design, Babbage's engine, was entirely mechanical.

A wind up rover is a pretty cool idea, wonder what they are planning on using for spring materials? Need some pretty fancy metals to avoid relaxation at the 450 odd C on the surface...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn and anorlunda