Mechanical Steel vs. Magnetic Levitation Composite Flywheels?

AI Thread Summary
An ideal composite flywheel, magnetically levitated in a vacuum, can store approximately eight times more energy per unit mass than an ideal ball bearing steel alloy flywheel of the same size and shape. The significant difference in energy storage is attributed to the ability of composite materials to withstand much higher rotational velocities compared to steel. The discussion highlights that while the support mechanism (maglev vs. bearings) influences energy efficiency, the material's specific strength is crucial for maximum speed. It is noted that energy density relates directly to specific strength, while velocity is proportional to the square root of specific strength. Overall, composite flywheels present a superior option for energy storage due to their enhanced performance characteristics.
BasketDaN
Messages
96
Reaction score
0
Spinning at their respective maximum velocities, approximately how much more energy will an ideal composite flywheel (magnetically levitated in a vaccum) be able to store than an ideal ball bearing steel alloy flywheel of the same size and shape? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Anybody? ..
 
Isn't it purely dependent upon the rotating mass (and distribution thereof) as opposed to what material is used?
 
I think he's asking about the difference that the support mechanism makes -- maglev versus bearings with physical contact. It seems like the maglev approach will still burn energy, because it will likely take some active feedback to keep the flywheel balanced while it spins, especially at high velocities. To the OP -- were you thinking of some passive maglev scheme to try to minimize the extra energy needed? Is passive maglev going to be sufficient? Do you have examples of maglev flywheels that you can point us to for reference?
 
I see. I thought that the phrase 'ball bearing steel alloy flywheel' meant that the wheel was made out of bearing metal, not that it was supported by ball bearings.
 
BasketDaN said:
Spinning at their respective maximum velocities, approximately how much more energy will an ideal composite flywheel (magnetically levitated in a vaccum) be able to store than an ideal ball bearing steel alloy flywheel of the same size and shape? Thanks.

Looks to be about 8x more energy / unit mass for composites from the figures at

http://www.aspes.ch/faq.html#Why%20composite%20materials

(CFRP, some sort of carbon fiber composite, I guess, having the highest rating).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The difference only exists because composite flywheels are able to withstand far greater rotational velocities than are steel flywheel.s

Yeah, I found that site too,, do you think the specific strength is directly proportional to the maximum speed it can withstand?
 
Nope, velocity goes as the square-root of the specific strength, energy density goes directly as the specific strength.
 
Back
Top