Mechanics: Displacement Vector

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the value of the scalar parameter t that minimizes the length of the displacement vector r(t) = (1-t)i + (3+2t)j + (t-4)k. Participants are exploring the implications of the vector's magnitude and its relationship to the parameter t.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Some participants attempt to find the minimum length by setting the magnitude of the vector to zero, while others question the validity of this approach, suggesting that the minimum length may not necessarily be zero unless the vector passes through the origin.
  • There are discussions about sketching the vector in two dimensions to better understand the problem, and some participants suggest differentiating the length function to find critical points.
  • One participant mentions the use of the quadratic formula and expresses confusion over a negative discriminant, prompting further exploration of the problem setup.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, with some suggesting differentiation as a method to find the minimum length. There is a recognition that the problem is asking for the value of t rather than the length itself, and some guidance has been offered regarding the approach to take. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being explored, particularly regarding the conditions for minimizing the vector's length.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing discussion about the assumptions made regarding the vector's behavior and the implications of its components. Some participants are also reflecting on the complexity of differentiating the function and the potential for errors in calculations.

teme92
Messages
185
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



Consider the vector r(t)= (1-t)i + (3+2t)j + (t-4)k which depends on scalar parameter t. For which t0 is the length of r(t0) minimal?

Homework Equations



Equations of motion

The Attempt at a Solution



So I approached this question by saying the length would be minimal when the magnitude is minimal ie. |r|=0.

|r|=√[(1-t)2+(3+2t)2+(t-4)2]

Simplified down I got 3t2+t+13=0

I tried using the quadratic formula to solve this then but couldn't as the value under the square root was negative.

Am I approaching this question wrong then? Any help would be much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
teme92 said:

Homework Statement



Consider the vector r(t)= (1-t)i + (3+2t)j + (t-4)k which depends on scalar parameter t. For which t0 is the length of r(t0) minimal?

Homework Equations



Equations of motion

The Attempt at a Solution



So I approached this question by saying the length would be minimal when the magnitude is minimal ie. |r|=0.

|r|=√[(1-t)2+(3+2t)2+(t-4)2]

Simplified down I got 3t2+t+13=0

I tried using the quadratic formula to solve this then but couldn't as the value under the square root was negative.

Am I approaching this question wrong then? Any help would be much appreciated.

Why would you assume that the smallest value of |r| is zero? That would be the case only if the line passes through the origin. Draw a sketch of a similar situation in two dimensions, and look carefully at the picture.
 
So if t is the x-axis and r(t) the y-axis when t=0 r(t) is at a minimum?
 
Actually is it when the x-compenent is zero. So in this case 1-t=0 so t=1?
 
##\vec{r}(t)## describes a curve in three dimensions, and ##t## is a parameter telling you where you are on that curve. To sketch the curve, you need to do so in three dimensions. Ray is suggesting you try a simpler example where the curve lies in two dimensions so you can get an idea of how to analyze the problem correctly. For instance, you could try a curve like ##\vec{r}(t) = (t-1)\hat{i} + (t+2)\hat{j}##.

Back to the original problem… You found the length ##\| \vec{r}(t) \| = \sqrt{2(3t^2+t+13)}## as a function of ##t##. You want to find where this function attains a minimum. How do you do that?
 
Differentiate and let it equal to zero. Then sub t values back into r(t)?
 
Right. The problem is only asking for the value of ##t##, so you don't need to plug the value back into ##\vec{r}(t)##, though you might try it to see if the answer is reasonable.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Ok vela thanks for the help. I got t=1/3 in the end. There was chain rule involved in differentiating so it would take a while to type it out. Thanks for the help again.
 
You're off by a factor of 2.
 
  • #10
teme92 said:
Differentiate and let it equal to zero. Then sub t values back into r(t)?

Even easier: ##|r|## is a minimum if and only if ##r^2## is a minimum (why?), so you might as well just minimize ##r^2 = (1-t)^2 + (3+2t)^2 + (t-4)^2 = 6 t^2 + 2t + 26.##
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K