Mechanics: Next Level After AP French

  • Thread starter Thread starter WiFO215
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mechanics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the appropriate next steps in studying mechanics after completing AP French. With a solid foundation in mathematics, including calculus and linear algebra, the individual seeks guidance on whether to tackle advanced texts like Goldstein or L&L, or to start with more introductory books like Symon or Taylor. Recommendations favor Goldstein for its depth and comprehensive coverage of topics, despite its requirement for a strong mathematical background and independent study, while Taylor is noted for its clarity and conceptual explanations but is considered less rigorous. Overall, Goldstein is suggested as the more suitable choice for advancing in mechanics given the individual's math proficiency.
WiFO215
Messages
416
Reaction score
1
I didn't want to steal the topic of the person below. I have completed using AP French and am looking for the next level of mechanics. I have a decent background of math (Calc. of Variations, ODEs (no PDEs), Fourier Series, Linear Algebra. Is the next step Goldstein/ L&L or should I go through something like Symon or Taylor first?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
anirudh215 said:
I didn't want to steal the topic of the person below. I have completed using AP French and am looking for the next level of mechanics. I have a decent background of math (Calc. of Variations, ODEs (no PDEs), Fourier Series, Linear Algebra. Is the next step Goldstein/ L&L or should I go through something like Symon or Taylor first?
I would suggest you read Goldstein.

Taylor (I don't know Symon) is a very good introductory book (he's very smooth on Lagrangian/Hamiltonian) but stays at the surface of the topics. He's comparable to Griffiths : he explains very well what he does, talk about concepts, but doesn't go too far. We used in the first year of University in physics.

On the other hands, Goldstein goes way further than Taylor, but still explains very well too. It has a lot more topics in it, but you need a good background in maths and to be independant (there's no answers in the back!). It was used in second year of University where I'm from. I think your level of maths is sufficient to read it.
 
Last edited:
Thanks.
 
TL;DR Summary: Book after Sakurai Modern Quantum Physics I am doing a comprehensive reading of sakurai and I have solved every problem from chapters I finished on my own, I will finish the book within 2 weeks and I want to delve into qft and other particle physics related topics, not from summaries but comprehensive books, I will start a graduate program related to cern in 3 months, I alreadily knew some qft but now I want to do it, hence do a good book with good problems in it first...
TLDR: is Blennow "Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering" a good follow-up to Altland "Mathematics for physicists"? Hello everybody, returning to physics after 30-something years, I felt the need to brush up my maths first. It took me 6 months and I'm currently more than half way through the Altland "Mathematics for physicists" book, covering the math for undergraduate studies at the right level of sophystication, most of which I howewer already knew (being an aerospace engineer)...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
17K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
11K
Replies
19
Views
10K
Back
Top