Mechanics-related car question

  • Thread starter Thread starter lando45
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Car
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a mechanics problem involving a car approaching a traffic light. The initial calculations for distance traveled before the light turns red were incorrect due to unit conversion errors in acceleration. The correct acceleration should be converted from km/h to m/s, resulting in a value of 0.98 m/s². After addressing the unit issue, the original poster successfully recalculated the distance traveled. The conversation highlights the importance of consistent units in physics problems.
lando45
Messages
84
Reaction score
1
Hey,

I have been set this question and I thought I'd answered it perfectly but it turns out I haven't:

A person driving her car at 43 km/h approaches an intersection just as the traffic light turns yellow. She knows that the yellow light lasts only 2.0 s before turning to red, and she is 30 m away from the near side of the intersection. The intersection is 15 m wide. Her car can accelerate from 43 km/h to 70 km/h in 8.1 s. Ignore the length of her car and her reaction time. If she hits the gas, how far will she travel before the light turns red?


2_29.gif


I decided to use s = ut + ½at² as it seemd the most appropriate, here's what I got:

s = distance traveled = unknown
u = initial speed = 43km/h = 11.944m/s
t = time = 2.0s
a = acceleration = (70km/h - 43km/h) / 8.1s = 3.333m/s/s

s = (11.944 x 2) + (½ x 3.333 x 2.0²)
s = 23.888 + 6.666
s = 30.555m

So I got the distance traveled by the car in the 2 seconds before the light turned red if the driver sped up to be 30.555m but my teacher tells me this is wrong...anyone know why?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The acceleration is wrong. You need to use the same units for all variables.

- Kamataat
 
Yes, this is just an error in your units. I didn't pay attention as I thought you did the conversion, but Kamataat is right.

Anyway, accelerating from 43 to 70 km/h in 8.1s is way slower than an acceleration of 3.3 m/s² (i didn't do the math though)

I think just doing the right conversion as Kamataat said should work. Did your teacher give you the correct answer?

Kyon.
 
Ah thanks a lot, I solved it correctly now. Just had to convert the acceleration from 3.333km/h/s to 0.98m/s/s. Thanks again guys.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top