Medical Physics - What Bio do I need?

AI Thread Summary
Graduate programs in medical physics often require varying levels of biology and chemistry knowledge, with some schools favoring a year of biology alongside chemistry, while others may accept a Human Anatomy and Physiology course instead. It's crucial to check specific program requirements, as they differ based on the focus area within medical physics. A full year of biology and chemistry is generally recommended to grasp essential concepts, particularly for those interested in radiation biology. Anatomy knowledge is beneficial, especially for roles in radiation oncology, but can often be acquired in graduate studies. Ultimately, selecting courses should align with the desired specialization in medical physics.
Kites
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
Hello. I am having a hard time finding information on this and really need some help.

I am a physics major at my school without a medical physics program. I am planning on going to graduate school and pursuing a masters/phd in medical physics. There are a few problems.

1) Most graduate schools require biology knowledge from undergraduate programs.

This is fine, the problem is how much? The sites bounce around on how much is preferred, some prefer the 1 year series in bio with the 1 year series in chemistry and that's all.

Then there are schools such as University of Penn. who only ask for 1 year of chemistry and preferably 1 Human Anatomy and Physiology Course.

My choices are pretty clear cut.

I can do the 1 year of chemistry along with my physics degree, 1 year of bio.

Or.

I can do the 1 year of chemistry along with 1 Human Anatomy & Physiology class and 1 quarter of Biology.

Which would be better? If it matters or not my GPA is about a 3.64 in my classes. Time is short and it's very difficult to work in classes so I would greatly appreciate any feedback given. Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
On a related note, how helpful or necessary is it to have taken an undergraduate anatomy course for medical physics? Or is it possible to just learn all you need to in grad school?
 
Here, "Medical Physics" is taken to mean the fields of both biomedical imaging and radiation dosimetry. I think your second option is more in line with preparation for this.
 
In general it's best to contact the specific programs you're interested into see what their requirements are, or if the program favours students with particular courses. As you've pointed out - the programs vary in their requirements, so in this respect it comes down to which programs you're going to aim for and/or feel you have the best shot with.

In my opinion as a medical physics resident, I would argue that a full year of biology and chemistry will help the most as they are necessary to understand the radiation biology that's covered in medical physics. A course in anatomy and physiology will certainly help as well, but my personal experience is that A&P can generally be picked up at the graduate level as needed. In fact, many graduate programs offer an A&P course geared towards medical physicists, so I wouldn't break my back to take that over fundamental biology and chemistry at the undergraduate level.

With respect to how much, in general, I think first year courses are sufficient. An additional course in molecular biology would help, but not at the expense of additional physics courses. Medical physicists are first and foremost physicists.
 
Last edited:
Medical Physics incorporates a lot of different subfields. I work as a Senior Medical Physicist in Radiation Oncology in a not for profit community hospital. Ok, so what does that mean? I work with patients who are receiving radiation to treat their cancer. Since one of my responsibilities is to review the patients treatment plan, it is very important for me to know anatomy. Not just where things are but how to identify structures on CT and MRI. I do not do any research.

A Diagnostic Physicist may not need as much anatomy or biology since they generally look at image quality. They do need a knowledge of it if they become a Radiation Safety Officer within a hospital setting since they will be calculating dose to structures during certain medical procedures.

A Health Physicist and Radiobiologic Physicist will need more chemistry and biology since they deal with more of the molecular effects of radiation.

To sum it all up, each program may have a different subfield focus making the requirements different. Think about which subspecialty you may be interested in and look for the requirements for those programs.


MedPhysGuru
 
As someone who teaches anatomy, has taught physiology, and may eventually start up an anatomy and physiology course, you should take a general biology course before you take anatomy and physiology. Many schools, such as ours, offer those as separate courses instead of one combined course. If you have NO biology background, I'd recommend an undergrad A&P course before trying to tackle graduate level learning of the subject. It's a whole different type of learning from physics, so taking a slightly watered-down undergrad course (it still isn't an easy course) will brace you better for the more advanced levels of learning the subject if you need it.

The downside to a full general biology course for your goals is that a lot of general biology focuses on plants, which you don't need at all for medical physics. The problem is, you can't skip that semester, because often that content is inter-twined with other important basics, like cell structure and cell division and genetics that you will need to understand for more advanced coursework.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
378
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top