Merry-go-round angular speed physics

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the new angular speed of a merry-go-round after a child jumps onto it. The initial conditions include a radius of 2.0 m, a moment of inertia of 250 kg m², and an initial rotation speed of 10 rpm. Participants emphasize the importance of considering angular momentum rather than the mass of the merry-go-round. There is uncertainty about whether the child's jump toward the center affects the rotational speed, with some believing it does not. The thread highlights the need for clarity on the calculations and encourages participants to share their solutions.
beocom6000yello
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
A merry-go-round of radius R=2.0 m has a moment of inertia I=250 kg m2, and is rotating at 10 rpm. A child whose mass is 25 kg jumps onto the edge of the merry-go-round, by jumping directly toward the center at 6.0 m/s. The new angular speed (in rpm) of the merry-go-round is approximately
A) 7.1
B) 8.5
C) 9.2
D) 10
E) 6.4

this is what i did: the moment of a thick disk is I = 1/2 MR^2... I THINK you could use that to find the mass of the merry-goat-round...but...if he jumps directly towards the center...does that have any impact on the rotational speed? I don't think it does.

i would think the answer would be 10 but my friend got a different solution...is there anyway that someone can help telling what they got?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
beocom6000yello said:
A merry-go-round of radius R=2.0 m has a moment of inertia I=250 kg m2, and is rotating at 10 rpm. A child whose mass is 25 kg jumps onto the edge of the merry-go-round, by jumping directly toward the center at 6.0 m/s. The new angular speed (in rpm) of the merry-go-round is approximately
A) 7.1
B) 8.5
C) 9.2
D) 10
E) 6.4

this is what i did: the moment of a thick disk is I = 1/2 MR^2... I THINK you could use that to find the mass of the merry-goat-round...but...if he jumps directly towards the center...does that have any impact on the rotational speed? I don't think it does.

i would think the answer would be 10 but my friend got a different solution...is there anyway that someone can help telling what they got?
You don't need to find the mass of the merry-go-round. Consider angular momentum.
 
beocom6000yello said:
i would think the answer would be 10 but my friend got a different solution...is there anyway that someone can help telling what they got?

It's been a few days, but I'm just curious to know whether you at all tried to find the right answer, after following the advice given by Doc Al, seeing that you labeled the question urgent.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top