Metal or Insulator: Examining Resistance in Multiple Directions

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion examines the classification of materials as metals or insulators based on resistance measurements in different directions (x and y) and how these measurements change with temperature. It explores the implications of anisotropic behavior in materials, particularly in the context of layered structures and their electrical properties.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the classification of a material as a metal or insulator can depend on the direction of resistance measurement, suggesting that a material may exhibit metallic behavior in one direction while behaving like an insulator in another.
  • One participant mentions that in laminated core transformers, metal laminations are used alongside non-conducting varnish to limit eddy current losses, indicating practical applications of materials with directional resistance properties.
  • Another participant discusses cuprate superconductors, noting that they exhibit high conductivity in the [a,b] plane while being insulating along the c-axis, highlighting the commonality of such behavior in layered materials.
  • A participant points out that graphite displays higher resistivity in the c direction compared to the a-b plane, although they express uncertainty regarding its metallicity.
  • One participant seeks clarification on whether it is typical for resistance in one direction (x) to increase with temperature while remaining unchanged in another direction (y).

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that anisotropic behavior is present in many materials, but the specific question of whether it is usual for resistance to behave differently in two directions with temperature changes remains unresolved. Multiple competing views on the implications of these observations are present.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the definitions of metallic and insulating behavior, as well as the dependence on specific material structures and temperature effects, which are not fully resolved.

howl
Messages
15
Reaction score
1
Generally, a material is metal or insulator is simply determined by the gap. But if we view it in another way, to measure the resistance in different direction, says x and y, and there are usually different. And then measure the resistance change with temperature. Usually, the resistances goes up with temperature increases is metal, while resistances goes down is insulator, or semiconductor. If one finds that a material in x direction looks like metal in this resistance experimental, while in y no, is this situation possible? If so, could we say this material is metal just in x direction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
howl said:
Generally, a material is metal or insulator is simply determined by the gap. But if we view it in another way, to measure the resistance in different direction, says x and y, and there are usually different. And then measure the resistance change with temperature. Usually, the resistances goes up with temperature increases is metal, while resistances goes down is insulator, or semiconductor. If one finds that a material in x direction looks like metal in this resistance experimental, while in y no, is this situation possible? If so, could we say this material is metal just in x direction?
We use such material in laminated core transformers. The metal laminations are separated by non-conducting varnish. This is used to limit eddy current losses in the core:

https://qph.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-99d6364e32355e6c00ab138131eeb3c5

main-qimg-99d6364e32355e6c00ab138131eeb3c5.gif
 

Attachments

  • main-qimg-99d6364e32355e6c00ab138131eeb3c5.gif
    main-qimg-99d6364e32355e6c00ab138131eeb3c5.gif
    15.2 KB · Views: 618
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: aaroman and CWatters
howl said:
Generally, a material is metal or insulator is simply determined by the gap. But if we view it in another way, to measure the resistance in different direction, says x and y, and there are usually different. And then measure the resistance change with temperature. Usually, the resistances goes up with temperature increases is metal, while resistances goes down is insulator, or semiconductor. If one finds that a material in x direction looks like metal in this resistance experimental, while in y no, is this situation possible? If so, could we say this material is metal just in x direction?

The cuprate superconductors are made up of layers of different atoms and molecules.

HTS_crystal_structures.jpg


Along the so-called [a,b] plane where the Cu-O planes lie, it is very conducting, almost like a typical metal. Along the c-axis (vertical direction), the resistivity can be several orders of magnitude higher, and often considered to be insulating.

There are many layered materials that behave this way, so it isn't that exotic anymore.

Zz.
 

Attachments

  • HTS_crystal_structures.jpg
    HTS_crystal_structures.jpg
    37.8 KB · Views: 817
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: aaroman and NathanaelNolk
As far as I know graphite is such a material. Its resistivity is much higher in the c direction than in the a-b plane. I do not know about its metallicity though.
 
Thanks for your answers!
I know that there is anisotropy in many materials, what I want to know is when temperature goes up, resistance in x increases, while y no, is it usual?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
16K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K