Meteorite heading towards earth

  • Thread starter Thread starter josephcollins
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Earth Meteorite
AI Thread Summary
A meteorite with an initial velocity of 2.00*10^4 m/s is calculated to collide with Earth at a final velocity of 2.15*10^4 m/s, based on energy conservation principles. There is a debate about the correctness of dividing by 2 in the energy equations, with some arguing that the change in potential energy should be considered differently. The discussion also touches on the terminology surrounding meteoroids and meteorites, clarifying that a meteoroid becomes a meteor when it enters the atmosphere. Concerns are raised about the potential for high-velocity impacts, suggesting that significant warning time is typically expected for large objects. The conversation highlights the complexities of calculating impact velocities and the implications of high-speed collisions with Earth.
josephcollins
Messages
59
Reaction score
0
Hi ppl. I have a short question. A meteorite of mass m has a velocity u=2.00*10^4 m/s when it is at an infinite distance from the earth. It eventually collides with the eath with a velocity v. Calculate v. given are the radius of earth(6.37*10^6m) and go=9.80Nkg^-1)

I used the argument that the change in kinetic energy is going to be equal to 0.5m(v^2-u^2) which also equals GMem/2Re which resolves to goRem/2. Equating and calculating gives 2.15*10^4m/s. Could someone verify that this is correct and that potential energy or total energy is not neglected in my reasoning? thanks, joe
 
Physics news on Phys.org
josephcollins said:
I used the argument that the change in kinetic energy is going to be equal to 0.5m(v^2-u^2) which also equals GMem/2Re which resolves to goRem/2.
I don't see why you divided by 2. (The change in PE should equal g R_e m)
 
Last edited:
Wow! That meteorite had quite the bounce to it to achieve that high and fast of an arc, don't you think?

Or perhaps your prof meant meteor?

;)
 
I'll bet the prof meant meteoroid on its way to becoming a meteorite. (If the meteoroid burns up--becoming a "shooting star"--then it would be a meteor.)

Regardless, that's one heck of a meteoroid to make it through the atmosphere with no apparent loss of mass. :smile:
 
Most scenarios seem to imply that massive objects hitting our planet would be traveling at a speed that would give days if not weeks of warning.

Is there any reason that a meteor should not hit the Earth at a very high relative velocity? Even one traveling at 80% the speed of light would be difficult to see coming, and hence be something of a surprise!
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top