Method of moments and integration

semidevil
Messages
156
Reaction score
2
i'm learning the method of moments and I'm not understanding on how to do it.

so for example, fy(y, theta) = theta*y^(theta -1). 0<=y<=1.

to find the method of moments estimate for theta.

the book does E(y) = the integeral from 0 to 1 of y * theta*y^(theta-1) dy.

and that becomes theta * y^theta+1/theta + 1

and that becomes theta/ theta + 1...


first question. am I really suppose to integrate y * theta*y^(theta-1) dy?

first of all, the book has never gone to any of the harder integration techniques, and i really have trouble integrating this. how did they do the steps??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
semidevil said:
i'm learning the method of moments and I'm not understanding on how to do it.

so for example, fy(y, theta) = theta*y^(theta -1). 0<=y<=1.

to find the method of moments estimate for theta.

the book does E(y) = the integeral from 0 to 1 of y * theta*y^(theta-1) dy.

and that becomes theta * y^theta+1/theta + 1

and that becomes theta/ theta + 1...


first question. am I really suppose to integrate y * theta*y^(theta-1) dy?

first of all, the book has never gone to any of the harder integration techniques, and i really have trouble integrating this. how did they do the steps??

Have you learned expected values or means in your class yet? If not - then your class is being badly taught.

The basic formula for calculating the expected value given some pdf is:

Integral[ y f(y) dy]

given a probability distribution function (pdf) f(y). That is equal to the mean, or first moment, and corresponds to the integral you give above.

Second, the integral that you give can be done by someone who knows one month of high-school calculus.

y* theta * y^{theta-1} can be simplified to theta* y^{theta}. Since theta is fixed, the integration is simple. Can you integrate 2*y^2? How about 3*y^3? Same thing.
 
Last edited:
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...

Similar threads

Back
Top