Methods of rotational energy harvesting and storage

AI Thread Summary
Methods for harvesting rotational energy include using turbines to compress air, electric generators paired with batteries, torsional springs, and flywheels, although the latter requires significant mass for effective energy storage. The pulsed alternator is highlighted as an efficient device that accumulates rotational kinetic energy and converts it into high-current electrical pulses, particularly useful in applications like rail guns. The discussion seeks to identify additional methods and products for efficient energy harvesting and storage beyond electromagnetic generators. Efficiency remains a key concern in selecting the best method. Overall, exploring various technologies can enhance the effectiveness of rotational energy harvesting systems.
physea
Messages
211
Reaction score
3
Hello!

What are the available methods to harvest rotational energy?
I was thinking to put a turbine on the shaft and compress air, but the air will get cold and the energy will be lost.
I was thinking to put an electric generator, which is ok but it needs a battery.
I was thinking to use torsional springs.
I was thinking to use a flywheel, but it must have quite large mass to store the energy.

Are there any other methods to harvest and store the rotational energy of a shaft?
Which would be the most efficient?
Are there any products/systems sold? (apart from the electromagnetic generator).

Thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
There is a device called a pulsed alternator that is used to power rail guns. It allows the accumulation of rotational kinetic energy over an extended time period with a quick conversion to a high-current electrical pulse when the energy is dumped.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top