Metric for non-inertial coordinate system

Dixanadu
Messages
250
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Hey guys.

So here's the problem:

Consider an ordinary 2D flat spacetime in Cartesian coordinates with the line element
ds^{2}=-dt^{2}+dx^{2}

Now consider a non-inertial coordinate system (t',x'), given by

t'=t, x'=x-vt-\frac{1}{2}at^{2}

(1) What is the metric in these coordinates?

There are some more questions apart from this but I think I can do those if I know how to do this part.

Homework Equations



None


The Attempt at a Solution



Okay so here's why I'm confused. How do I get the line element in these coordinates? Here are the two options in my mind...which one is correct?

OPTION 1
The line element they are looking for is ds^{2}=-dt^{2}+dx'^{2} where dx'=dx-(v+at)dt

OPTION 2
The line element they are looking for is ds^{2}=-dt^{2}+dx^{2}, where dx=dx'+(v+at)dt

Both of these options give different metrics...so which one (if any) is the way to go?

Thanks guys!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
All you have to do is calculate ##dx## and ##dt## in terms of the ##(t',x')## coordinates and plug them into ##ds^2 = -dt^2 + dx^2## to get the metric in ##(t',x')## coordinates.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top