Metrics on a manifold, gravity waves, gauge freedom

Michael_1812
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Suppose I have a manifold. I say that it can support a certain configuration of gravity field described by metric tensor \gamma. I do not write \gamma_{\mu\nu}, because that would immediately imply a reference to a particular chart. A tensor field, however, exists on a manifold unrelated to this manifold's parameterisation. It is a box, in which you deposit two vectors, and which then spits out a scalar.

Can I always assume that, for any twice-covariant tensor \gamma, there exists (not necessarily global) a chart, for which this tensor acts as a metric?

Let me now express my question a bit more carefully. We always introduce a manifold via local charts. Suppose some patch of the manifold is parametrisable by some grid z^\mu with metric w_{\mu\nu}. Can I always introduce on this patch a new grid x^\alpha, whose metric is exactly the desired \gamma? (whom I shall now call \gamma_{\alpha\beta} ) Please be mindful that I am talking not about an infinitesimal neighbourhood, but about a finite patch.

I suspect that the answer to my question is negative, though I am not 100% sure. Here is my argument. Suppose that such a coordinate chart can always be assembled. I take a "background metric" \gamma and build the appropriate grid x^\alpha. I take a "perturbed metric" g and construct an appropriate chart y^\alpha. Then, if g and \gamma are "close", their difference being h, I shall say that the difference between g and \gamma is solely due to a coordinate transformation. Hence the gravitational perturbation h is always a gauge effect.

If h can be an actual physical variation, then the answer to my above question must be negative.

This logic, if correct, presents a physical answer to the question.
Still, I would love to see a mathematical argument.

Great many thanks,

Michael
 
Physics news on Phys.org
http://www.personal.soton.ac.uk/jav/karlhede.html
 
Dear atyy,
Thanks for the interesting link. While it is indeed relevant, it still does not provide an immediate answer to the question: given an arbitrary twice-covariant tensor field, is it possible to build, on a *finite* patch, a coordinate grid, for which this tensor field act as a metric?
Thanks again,
Michael
 
What do you mean "act as a metric"? Whether a given tensor can be a metric or not doesn't depend on any coordinates. The only condition is that it must be symmetric, nondegenerate, and have a Lorentz signature.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
Back
Top