Micro-transactions [Research Paper Help]

  • Thread starter Thread starter yik-boh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Paper
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a request for opinions regarding micro-transactions for a research paper aimed at demonstrating their potential to reduce piracy. Participants express concerns about the validity of gathering opinions from random forum users, suggesting that such data may lack accuracy and reliability. Instead, they recommend seeking credible sources or expert interviews for more substantial information. The conversation highlights the importance of differentiating between opinions and factual data in academic research. Ultimately, the thread is locked due to concerns over adherence to homework help guidelines.
yik-boh
Messages
57
Reaction score
0
Guys, I need your help. I am now doing a research paper for my English class. It is about Micro-transactions. I am trying to prove that Micro-transaction will help solve or lessen piracy. I need your opinions about micro-transaction.

What are the benefits you get from it?
What is/are lacking on the said business model?
How the flexibility of micro-transactions make it so that the price/cost of buying a product is not seen by the buyer as prohibitive and makes it so that the product is made much more accessible to people because of the decrease in price and adaptable paying scheme.

Those are just some of the questions. You can add if you want. Also, maybe you can write your real name when you answer because I might need it for bibliographical purposes. I hope you can help me. Thanks! :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is it actually part of your assignment that you are supposed to get opinions from others? Otherwise I think your thread may violate the homework help guidelines.
 
It is a research paper so I think first hand data in this case, interview, will be very useful and I mentioned that I will credit those who will answer by putting them in the citations or bibliography.
 
Those questions are better answered by research into people who actually know what it all means - or alternatively books/sources that can do so.

Interviewing random people on a site isn't really very good, and even if someone gives you some answers, without checking their accuracy it could be complete tripe and make your "first hand data" a load of nonsense. Remember, opinions =/= facts.

I may have a strong opinion on how bad it is and it doesn't help - but the reality may be the complete opposite.

So unless you are specifically looking for 'iffy data' you'd be better off asking for sources to help you answer them than for the answers themselves.
 
@jared: thanks for the advice! :) I will look into that. Yes maybe you're right but we can still wait if there are people who will answer or as you suggested, will give sources. :)
 
I agree with TSA & jared, this thread doesn't make sense.

Topic locked.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top