Microcanonical ensemble generalized pressure

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 1K views
Mayan Fung
Messages
131
Reaction score
14
In the discussion of the pressure in macrocanonical ensemble, I found in textbook that:
##dW = \bar p dV## (##dW## is in fact d_bar W, yet I can't type the bar)
The derivation goes like:
##\bar p = \frac{1}{Z} \sum_{r} e^{-\beta E_r} (-\frac{\partial E_r}{\partial V}) = ... = \frac{1}{\beta} \frac{\partial lnZ}{\partial V}##

However, ## E = TdS - pdV## and in macrocanonical ensemble, we have ##T,V,N## as variables. That means ##\frac{\partial E_r}{\partial V} = (\frac{\partial E_r}{\partial V})_{T,N}## but not keeping entropy ##S## constant.

I am confused about why we can use ##\frac{\partial E_r}{\partial V}## in the above derivation
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's just using different potentials. It turns out that ##\Phi=-k_B T \ln Z## is the Landau potential with natural variables ##S##, ##T##, and ##\mu##. The relation with the internal energy ##U## is
$$\Phi=U-TS-\mu N.$$

For details see

https://itp.uni-frankfurt.de/~hees/publ/off-eq-qft.pdf
Sect. 2.1.4

Note that in this manuscript I use natural units with ##k_B=1## and in the relativistic context instead of a conserved particle number I use some conserved charge ##Q## (like electric chrage) to introduce a corresponding chemical potential.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ORF