Microwaves and Interference problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the frequency of microwaves based on the interference pattern observed using a goniometer. The initial calculation of 20.2 GHz was derived from the formula f = c*n/x, but it was deemed incorrect. Participants suggest that the presence of maxima could indicate half-wavelengths, leading to a revised frequency of 10.1 GHz based on a different interpretation of the maxima and path difference. The role of the goniometer in measuring angles and the setup's specifics are also questioned, as understanding how the reflector affects the signal is crucial for accurate calculations. Clarification on the experimental setup and a diagram may help resolve the confusion.
srh38
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm working on my physics prelab, but I can't seem to get this answer. The question states:

Measuring the detector´s output as a function of its position along the goniometer (look it up!), we see that there are maxima and minima in the signal. Starting at one of the maxima, we find 6 additional maxima after moving the reflector a distance of 8.91 cm. Therefore, the frequency of the microwaves from this generator is ____________.

The answer is supposed to be in GHz. I've tried using the equation nλ=dsinθ where x≈dsinθ and λ=c/f. That would give f = c*n/x where x = 8.91 cm and n = 6. This gave me 20.2 GHz, but apparently isn't the right answer... Help please??
 
Science news on Phys.org
goniometer ?

did you spell that correctly ?
looking in wiki I can't see how it applies to Measuring the wavelength of an RF signal ??

Maybe it has a use that they or I am not familiar with

doing the math, 8.91cm /6 = 1.485cm
300 (c) / 1.485 = 20.2 GHz ( as you said)
desperately trying to remember if you would see maxima at 1/2 wavelength and as well as each wavelength

in that case 6 maxima would be 6 halfwaves
1.485 x 2 = λ = 2.97 therefore 300 / 2.97 = 10.1 GHz

hopefully someone else will confirm what the correct way is :smile:Dave
 
Last edited:
@davenn I'm not sure how it applies either, I checked the spelling and it is correct. I don't think it affects how we calculate frequency though... I just don't understand what I'm doing wrong
 
Welcome to PF;
##d\sin\theta ## would normally be a path difference.
Presumably the reflector controls the path difference somehow?

The existence of the interference pattern is shown by changing the angular position of the detector - which is the reference to the goniometer. The goniometer is then used to accurately fix the detector at the angle of one of the maxima.

Then you move a reflector (not the detector - leave the goniometer alone) some linear distance, the signal at the detector decreases, then increases ... when this has happened six times, the mirror is a distance x6 from it's initial position at x0. You are told that x6-x0=8.91cm

How does the position of the mirror affect the signal at the detector?

How much does the path diffreence have to change by in order to put a maxima, once more, on the detector angle?
 
Last edited:
srh38 said:
@davenn I'm not sure how it applies either, I checked the spelling and it is correct. I don't think it affects how we calculate frequency though... I just don't understand what I'm doing wrong

Isn't a goniometer just an instrument for measuring angles? That would be what you wanted (although not a term which I have come across in this context) for measuring the directions of peaks and nulls in an interference (diffraction) pattern. ? Sounds like shades of the Bragg diffraction formula, even.
So that we're all reading off the same hymn sheet, perhaps a diagram would help. The answer just has to be easy if we are solving the appropriate problem.
 
@srh38: We don't know the setup - so we cannot tell how moving the "reflector" changes the path difference to the detector.
Presumably you know that - so we need to hear from you.
Till then - that's the best I can do.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top