I Minimize grand potential functional for density matrix

dRic2
Gold Member
Messages
887
Reaction score
225
TL;DR Summary
##\rho## is the density matrix
##\Omega## is the grand potential
##\text{Tr}## stands for 'trace'
I'd like to show that, by minimizing this functional
$$\Omega[\hat \rho] = \text{Tr} \hat \rho \left[ \hat H - \mu \hat N + \frac 1 {\beta} \log \hat \rho \right]$$
I get the well known expression
$$\Omega[\hat \rho_0] = - \frac 1 {\beta} \log \text{Tr} e^{-\beta (\hat H - \mu \hat N )}$$

I'm familiar with minimizing a functional of the form ##F[g] = \int dx f(g(x))##, but this notations for operators eludes me.

Thanks,
Ric
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I've found the original paper (PhysRev.137.A1441) where Mermin introduced this functional. You can check the proof in the Appendix (If I'm not mistaken it was first proved by von Neumann).

To sum up the idea behind the proof is to define the operator ##\rho_{\lambda} = \frac {e^{H-\mu N + \lambda \Delta}} {\text{Tr}e^{H-\mu N + \lambda \Delta}}## with ##\Delta = -H + \mu N - \frac 1 {\beta} \log \rho##. You can see that because of ##\text{Tr} \rho =1## for ##\lambda = 1## I get ##\rho_1 = \rho## and for ##\lambda = 0## you get ##\rho = \rho_0## (the equilibrium value). You can then proceed to study the following relation ##\Omega[\rho] - \Omega[\rho_0] = \Omega[\rho_{\lambda = 1}] - \Omega[\rho_{\lambda = 0}] = \int_0^1 \frac {\partial \Omega[\rho_{\lambda}]} {\partial \lambda} d \lambda## and check that is always greater than zero and zero only if ##\lambda = 0## thus proving that ##\rho_0## minimizes the functional
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top