Minimizing Volume in 3-Space: Plane Equation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cragar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Volume
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the equation of a plane that minimizes volume in the first octant while passing through the point (1,1,1). One participant suggests that if the plane bisects the corner from (1,1,1) to the origin, it does not enclose any volume, which aligns with the teacher's assertion. They agree that there are infinitely many planes through (0,0,0) and (1,1,1) that do not create a bounded region in the first octant. The conversation highlights the importance of interpreting the problem's wording and definitions, particularly regarding what it means to "enclose" volume. Ultimately, the best approach is to solve the problem from both perspectives to find a clever solution and the intended one.
cragar
Messages
2,546
Reaction score
3
I once had a home work question that asked us to find the equation of a plane that went through the point (1,1,1) an enclosed the least amount of volume in the first octant . I know how to do it with derivatives and all that but what if the plane was on edge going from (1,1,1) to the origin . It would be like having a sheet of glass bisect the corner of the room but my teacher said that it had no top on it and it enclosed no volume , so what do you guys think ?
I think the equation of my plane would be y=x in 3-space .
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I think your teacher is completely correct! There are, in fact, an infinite number of planes passing through both (0, 0, 0) and (1, 1, 1) (y= x is one of them but rotating that around the line x= t+ 1, y= t+ 1, z= t+ 1 gives another for every angle of rotation between 0 and 2\pi) but none of then "cut off" a bounded region of the first octant.
 
why can't we say it cuts off zero volume .
 
Depending on the detailed wording of the problem (and the chosen definition of the word 'enclose'), you probably could.

But the best would be to solve the problem both ways, i.e. also assume that you're supposed to find the plane that cuts off the minimal volume in that octant, while intersecting somewhere on all three axes.

Then you'd have your "clever solution" as well as what is probably the "intended solution".
 
ya i was thinking it would work
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top