Minimum boundary when dividing eqilateral triangle in 4 equal sized parts

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on dividing an equilateral triangle into four equal-area parts while minimizing the amount of fencing required. Two primary methods are proposed: one involves creating a circle in the center with segments connecting to the midpoints of the sides, and the other suggests cutting the corners with a curve symmetrical around the bisectors. Initial calculations indicate that using a circle reduces the fencing needed to approximately 0.475 of the total perimeter, compared to 0.5 with a triangle formed by connecting midpoints. The conversation also explores the possibility of using differential equations to determine the optimal curve for minimal fencing. Overall, the circle appears to be the most efficient solution, though further proof is needed to confirm this.
jonas.hall
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
So I have an equilateral triangle an I want to divide it in 4 parts, all having the same area. This can be done in a multitude of ways of course. But assuming it's a garden and the division is about putting up a fence, which division uses the least fencing?

Now I have two alternatives so far.

The first is to create a cirle in the middle and add three short segments from the circle to the midpoints of the sides. There should be a uniqe such solution and I just haven't bothered calculating it yet.

The second is, in my opinion more interesting. Cut of the corners with a curve symmetrical around the bisectors. Now if this curve was a straight line at right angles to the bisector it would be uniquely determined. Also if it was a circle centered in the vertex. After calculating some special cases one might be satisfied and pick the best but I was thinking one might set up a differential equation to find the best possible curve. But how would I set this up? Perhaps this should be posted in Differential equations instead?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Here's a simple alternative - I don't know if it is minimal, but it might be. Bisect each side and connect the three midpoints to form a triangle. You will have four equilateral triangles, each having 1/4 of the area.
 
mathman said:
Here's a simple alternative - I don't know if it is minimal, but it might be. Bisect each side and connect the three midpoints to form a triangle. You will have four equilateral triangles, each having 1/4 of the area.

I tried that and the fencing needed is then exactly 0.5 of the total perimeter. Using a circle to cut of the corners lowers this to approximately 0.475. I have som argument that points towards thie circle being best, but no proofs or counterexamples.

Your example is actually the special case with a perpendicular line being the curve.

The circle bulges inward in the middle and comes out at the edges but because of the slope of the triangle the endpoints then come closer to each other, making the distance shorter.

I've been thinking about coshyp curves and parabolas but I wonder if the curve has to be orthogonal to any ray from the vertex, forcing it to be a circle. This might be so because this condition would minimize the distance for a given area locally, or infinitesimally. But I don't know if this holds "globally" i.e. when inegrated.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Back
Top