Minimum distance between skew vectors

  • Thread starter Thread starter peripatein
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Minimum Vectors
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the minimum distance between two skew vectors representing satellites A and B, which move at constant velocities. The participants explore whether the minimum distance can be simplified to a3 - b3, concluding that while this represents the normal distance between their paths, it does not account for their velocities. The minimum distance is clarified as the distance at a specific moment in time, suggesting the use of a distance formula that incorporates both satellites' positions and velocities. A derivative can be taken to find the exact moment when the satellites are closest to each other. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the complexity of calculating minimum distances in three-dimensional space with varying velocities.
peripatein
Messages
868
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Satellites A and B are traced at a particular moment by a space base located at the origin, with respect to which they move at constant velocities:
A0 = (a1,0,a3); B0 = (0,b2,b3)
V of satellite A = (Va,0,0); V of satellite B = (Vb,Vb,0)

Is the minimum distance between the satellites equal to the distance between the two skew vectors A = (a1,0,a3) + (Va,0,0)t and B = (0,b2,b3) + (Vb,Vb,0)t? Are they indeed skew?

If so, the distance is a3-b3, which does not seem reasonable to me (as over simpified and does not involve too many of the problem's parameters).

Any advice, please?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I drew a quick picture which helped me. The answer to the first question is I don't know. The answer to the second question I think is yes (they certainly aren't parallel).

Does minimum here mean the straightest path or some point in time? Who knows. However, you're coming up with a constant number which can't be right for either definition.

a3-b3 (maybe take the absolute value because a3-b3 could be negative) is the normal distance between the two lines the satellites travel on. Both satellites are traveling in planes parallel to the xy plane because both have a velocity of 0 in the z direction. However, this doesn't mean the satellites were ever that close apart because Va doesn't equal Vb. a3-b3 is the minimum distance between the paths the satellites travel on.

Here is what I think is the best answer to this question which is the distance formula at a moment in time: [((a1+Va*t)-(0+Vb*t))^2+((0+0*t)-(b2+Vb*t))^2+((a3+0*t)-(b3+0*t))^2]^.5
Take the derivative to find the point in time when they are the closet.

Does that help some?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top