Minkowski-minkowski thin shell paradoxon?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mersecske
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Shell
mersecske
Messages
186
Reaction score
0
Spherically symmetric infinitesimally thin shells
can be described via the well known junction formalism of Israel.
Let us consider such shell in vacuum,
this means that on both sides of the shell we have Schwarzschild spacetimes.
One of the dynamical equations is the first component of the Einstein equation
in the thin shell limit:

sqrt(1-2mc/r+v^2) - sqrt(1-2(mc+mg)/r+v^2) = mr/r

where r is the circumferential radius;
v = dr/dtau, and tau is the proper time of the shell;
mc is the central Schwarzschild mass parameter;
mg is the gravitational mass of the shell, this means
that the outer Schwarzschild mass parameter is mc+mg;
and mr is the rest mass of the shell, mr > 0;

Let assume the dust case,
when all mass parameters are contant during the motion.

In the case of Minkowski-Minkowski junction mc=0, mg=0
and the equation reduces to

sqrt(1+v^2) - sqrt(1+v^2) = mr/r

therefore mr=0 is the only solution.
This is what we expect becaue the whole space is Minkowski.

But let us consider Minkowski-Schwarzschild junction.
In this case mc=0 but mg is not restricted.
The equation is

sqrt(1+v^2) - sqrt(1-2mg/r+v^2) = mr/r

The solution of this equation for mg is:

mg = mr(2r*sqrt(1+v^2)-mr)/r/2

We can see that for mr=0 we get mg=0,
but it is possible to set mg=0 with positive mr also!
For example with the initial condition v=0,
and mr=2r we get mg=0.
And since mass parameters are constant during the motion,
we get a moving shell solution with positive rest mass
but zero gravitational mass,
which means that the spacetime is Minkowski both inside and outside!
It is very strange if this is the reality.
We have energy in the spacetime
but the spacetime is Minkowski except on a singular hypesurface.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Suppose

\sqrt{1 + x} - \sqrt{1 + y} = z.

Then, x = y implies z = 0.

Rearrangement and squaring, however, gives

<br /> \begin{equation*}<br /> \begin{split}<br /> 1 + y &amp;= \left(\sqrt{1 + x} -z \right)^2 \\<br /> &amp;= 1 +x -2z\sqrt{1 + x} + z^2 \\<br /> y &amp;= x + z\left(z - 2\sqrt{1 + x}\right) .<br /> \end{equation*}<br /> \end{split}<br />

Consequently, x = y implies z = 0 or z = 2\sqrt{1 + x}. What happened?
 
Thank you, sorry about this triviality
 
But I have another question.
Now we assume Schwarzschild-Schwarzschild shell.
In this case mg can be negative,
and the positive energy theorem is not violated,
since mc + mg > 0 and mr > 0,
where mc is the central Schwarzschild mass parameter,
mr is the rest mass of the shell,
and mg is the gravitational mass of the shell.
How can we interpret this situation?
Above both horizon, this is a normal situation?
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top