How can you create a geodesic path using the metric and initial velocity?

Jack3145
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Let's say there is a small object heading towards Earth (it will burn up). It is first observed at:
x^{\\mu}=[x^{1},x^{2},x^{2},x^{4}]=[x_{0},y_{0},z_{0},t_{0}]
with a velocity:
V_{v}=[v_{1},v_{2},v_{3},v_{4}]

The metric is:
ds^{2} = dx^{2} + dy^{2} + dz^{2} -c^{2}*dt^{2}
g_{\\mu\\v} = \\left(\\begin{array}{cccc}<BR>1 & 0 & 0 & 0\\\\<BR>0 & 1 & 0 & 0\\\\<Br>0 & 0 & 1 & 0\\\\<BR>\\\\<BR>0 & 0 & 0 & 1<BR>\\end{array})\\right

Affinity is:
\\Gamma^{\\rho}{\\mu\\v} = 0

Riemann Curvature tensor is:
R^{\\rho}{\\mu\\v\\sigma} = 0

Ricci Tensor is:
R{\\mu\\sigma} = 0

My Question is how do you make a geodesic path from the metric and initial velocity?

V_{v} = x^{\\mu}*g_{\\mu\\v} and make incremental steps?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry for the abomination. I know that Minkowski Space has no external gravitational forces acting on it.
 
You can still edit post #1. Looks like you need to remove a lot of \ symbols.
 
You indicated an interest in a numerical solution. I did a Scilab solution for the Schwarzschild metric. Unfortunately I compressed the file using bz2 on Linux and my present (vista) decoder has a problem. If you are interested I will have my Linux machine back up in two weeks or perhaps somebody else will separate out the parts; the mash-up is probably my fault.
I never checked the compression or enhanced the program since nobody ever responded to my scilab post.
Some orbits are shown in the eps file at:
http://www.plaidheron.com/ray/temp/
drdth_f-example.eps
Ray
 
Last edited by a moderator:
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
Back
Top