Minumum electron energy and microscopes

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the minimum electron energy required to resolve an atom's dimensions using an electron microscope. The resolving power is limited by the wavelength, necessitating a wavelength of about 10 pm for a 100 pm atom. The participant initially misapplies the photon energy equation E = hc/λ, realizing it is not suitable for electrons. They seek clarification on using momentum and DeBroglie's equation to find the correct kinetic energy for electrons. The conversation emphasizes the need for proper equations to calculate electron energy in microscopy applications.
Firecloak
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The highest achievable resolving power of a microscope is limited only by the wavelength used; that is, the smallest item that can be distinguished has dimensions about equal to the wavelength. Suppose one wishes to "see" inside an atom. Assuming the atom to have a diameter of 100 pm, this means that one must be able to resolve a width of, say, 10 pm.

(a) If an electron microscope is used, what minimum electron energy is required?

Homework Equations



E = hc/λ
λ = h/p (DeBroglie wavelength)
p=sqrt(2mK) Momentum
Δλ = (h(1-cos θ))/mc Compton Shift

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried the equation E = hc/λ = (6.63e-34)(3e8)/(1e-12) = 1.24e6 eV, but that isn't the answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
E = hc/λ is for photons, not for electrons. What's the equation that gives an object's kinetic energy in terms of its momentum?
 
p=sqrt(2mK)

So, do I use that equation in conjunction with DeBroglie's? λ = h/p This one is used for electrons, right?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top