Mirrors and lenses under water

AI Thread Summary
Using a mirror underwater does not change its focal length, particularly with front-coated mirrors, as the reflection angle remains consistent despite the medium. However, when using a lens underwater, the focal length does change due to refraction, which is influenced by the refractive indices of water and the lens material. If a lens has the same refractive index as water, light would not bend, making it effectively invisible. The discussion highlights that while mirrors maintain their focal length, the interaction of light with lenses underwater leads to a shift in focus. This results in aberrations rather than a direct change in focal length for mirrors.
benw
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I just have 2 questions.

If you use a mirror under water would the focal length change? And same question, but if you use a lens under water would the focal length change?

I was thinking, light rays travel slower in water, so then it difracts away from the normal more than if it was in air, which means the light rays converge at a different point?
 
Science news on Phys.org
benw said:
I just have 2 questions.

If you use a mirror under water would the focal length change? And same question, but if you use a lens under water would the focal length change?
No. Yes.

Lenses depend on refraction, which depends on the ratio of refractive indexes of the two media on either side of an interface. So for example, if you have a piece of plastic that has exactly the same refractive index as water, light would not bend at all when going through it under water. In fact, it would be invisible. Also, this is the reason your eyes cannot focus under water.
 
To be 100% exact, "No" should read: "no when using front coated mirrors".

In your every day life, mirrors have a reflective layer at the back of a piece of glass. Just to make sure the cleaning lady doesn't scratch it off. Using such a mirror would change the focal length, as the light travels through glass, reflects of the reflective layer and then passes through the glass again. Going from water to glass and vice versa will happen differently in air or in water.

Just for the nitty gritty sake of it.

Greetz,
Leo
 
Even with a back coated mirror, I don't think the focal length would change, assuming the mirror glass is a uniform thickness.

The refraction on the way into the glass is canceled out by the refraction on the way back out, so you end up with the angle between the incident and reflected beam being determined just by the the angle of incidence.

Although the reflection angle is unchanged by the refractive media, there is an offset between the point the ray strikes the mirror and the point it leaves from. This offset depends on the thickness of the mirror glass, and the difference in the refractive indices of the glass and the other medium. But I think this offset results in an aberation in the focus of the mirror, rather than a change in its focal length?
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top